Have you ever wanted to white-label a website, like display it on your own domain? Or have you wanted to remove a watermark from a website that ask...
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
Neat approach that gets the job done. I'm curious though what the benefit is of even using bio.link here at all? It is just a simple single page. Why not instead just create a repo in GitHub with the single page of links served from GitHub Pages and point your links subdomain at that with a CNAME record? [Or some other similar service like GitLab Pages].
Umm, this really boils down to convenience...
I've already created a lot of links-in-bio pages in the past (some of them were super over-engineered, like edge-caching, redis and integrated admin dashboard), and I'm sure there are many bio-link open-source alternatives that reduce the entry barrier even further.
But I really like the convenience of changing the background image, having professionally-curated themes, repositioning links, not care about hosting or downtime, and since it's free, I really think I'd need a lot of good reasons to move away, but custom-domains aren't a good enough reason imo π.
Btw, I used bio-link as an example of how it could be utilized, but I usually use this technique for websites like framer, that have a watermark on the page and a custom domain requires premium... Cloudflare workers solves both, without costing a penny π
That makes sense. At first glance, the bio.link looked nothing more than a single page with some links and photo. But I can see the benefit considering the themes and other functionality especially if already using.
Yep, totally! I really don't like parts of development like optimizing CSS for mobile layouts, so yeah, I guess existing solutions are good as long as they work well π
π€
π
A neat exercise, but...you do realize this means you now have 2 domains with identical content so google will consider your new domain a duplicate of the first one and rank both sites lower since the content is no longer "unique" ?
This is bad for SEO is what i'm saying.
Other than that, i guess it's ok. I don't see much use for it, if i wanted domain B to point to content of A then i'd set up the site under domain B to start with.
You can do that easily by buying the domain, and using netlify/heroky/digital ocean apps for a static site or get a hosting server for like $5/month if you need a database and a dynamic setup.
That's a great point! I think we could easily prevent that by modifying the Cloudflare workers' script to contain a canonical tag.
Sure, you could always do that, but the use-cases I illustrated for the demo don't actually have that functionality. One essential requirement of the way you're implying is that the app should be open source, and the use-cases I show for are either, non-open source, or have limitations on the 'traditional' way to add a domain, such as the lack thereof, or the functionality sitting behind a paywall.
Thanks for reading and your awesome arguments π₯π
Another important con is that in a lot of cases, it's probably a violation of terms of service of whatever site you're using. When using this approach to remove a watermark, that's almost certainly the case.
Yep, it might be in most cases (certainly is, in the framer example), and that's why I've written
(for educational purposes only)
everywhere I guess where that might the case!Thanks for reading π₯
Great article, you also made me discover bio.link
Haha... it's pretty awesome that every bio.link feature is free! π
This is an amazing post Mohit. Thanks a lot. Saved me a ton of time!
Such an amazing post. Thank you!
Does this work for full domains (like fueler.io/dhravya)
Hey! I guess it should, since it's just a simple HTML page... don't know about the subpages though, but they should work with a few modifications in the script!