DEV Community

Cover image for How to serve *any* website from your own domain (for free!)

How to serve *any* website from your own domain (for free!)

Mohit Yadav on August 13, 2022

Have you ever wanted to white-label a website, like display it on your own domain? Or have you wanted to remove a watermark from a website that ask...
Collapse
 
cicirello profile image
Vincent A. Cicirello

Neat approach that gets the job done. I'm curious though what the benefit is of even using bio.link here at all? It is just a simple single page. Why not instead just create a repo in GitHub with the single page of links served from GitHub Pages and point your links subdomain at that with a CNAME record? [Or some other similar service like GitLab Pages].

Collapse
 
just_moh_it profile image
Mohit Yadav

Umm, this really boils down to convenience...

I've already created a lot of links-in-bio pages in the past (some of them were super over-engineered, like edge-caching, redis and integrated admin dashboard), and I'm sure there are many bio-link open-source alternatives that reduce the entry barrier even further.

But I really like the convenience of changing the background image, having professionally-curated themes, repositioning links, not care about hosting or downtime, and since it's free, I really think I'd need a lot of good reasons to move away, but custom-domains aren't a good enough reason imo πŸ™ƒ.

Btw, I used bio-link as an example of how it could be utilized, but I usually use this technique for websites like framer, that have a watermark on the page and a custom domain requires premium... Cloudflare workers solves both, without costing a penny πŸ˜ƒ

Collapse
 
cicirello profile image
Vincent A. Cicirello

That makes sense. At first glance, the bio.link looked nothing more than a single page with some links and photo. But I can see the benefit considering the themes and other functionality especially if already using.

Thread Thread
 
just_moh_it profile image
Mohit Yadav • Edited

Yep, totally! I really don't like parts of development like optimizing CSS for mobile layouts, so yeah, I guess existing solutions are good as long as they work well πŸ˜ƒ

Collapse
 
jacksonkasi profile image
Jackson Kasi

🀘

Collapse
 
just_moh_it profile image
Mohit Yadav

πŸ™ƒ

Collapse
 
ravavyr profile image
Ravavyr

A neat exercise, but...you do realize this means you now have 2 domains with identical content so google will consider your new domain a duplicate of the first one and rank both sites lower since the content is no longer "unique" ?

This is bad for SEO is what i'm saying.

Other than that, i guess it's ok. I don't see much use for it, if i wanted domain B to point to content of A then i'd set up the site under domain B to start with.

You can do that easily by buying the domain, and using netlify/heroky/digital ocean apps for a static site or get a hosting server for like $5/month if you need a database and a dynamic setup.

Collapse
 
just_moh_it profile image
Mohit Yadav

A neat exercise, but...you do realize this means you now have 2 domains with identical content so google will consider your new domain a duplicate of the first one and rank both sites lower since the content is no longer "unique" ?

That's a great point! I think we could easily prevent that by modifying the Cloudflare workers' script to contain a canonical tag.

Other than that, i guess it's ok. I don't see much use for it, if i wanted domain B to point to content of A then i'd set up the site under domain B to start with.

Sure, you could always do that, but the use-cases I illustrated for the demo don't actually have that functionality. One essential requirement of the way you're implying is that the app should be open source, and the use-cases I show for are either, non-open source, or have limitations on the 'traditional' way to add a domain, such as the lack thereof, or the functionality sitting behind a paywall.

Thanks for reading and your awesome arguments πŸ”₯πŸ˜ƒ

Collapse
 
michaelmior profile image
Michael Mior

Another important con is that in a lot of cases, it's probably a violation of terms of service of whatever site you're using. When using this approach to remove a watermark, that's almost certainly the case.

Collapse
 
just_moh_it profile image
Mohit Yadav

Another important con is that in a lot of cases, it's probably a violation of terms of service of whatever site you're using. When using this approach to remove a watermark, that's almost certainly the case.

Yep, it might be in most cases (certainly is, in the framer example), and that's why I've written (for educational purposes only) everywhere I guess where that might the case!

Thanks for reading πŸ”₯

Collapse
 
ccoveille profile image
Christophe Colombier

Great article, you also made me discover bio.link

Collapse
 
just_moh_it profile image
Mohit Yadav

Haha... it's pretty awesome that every bio.link feature is free! πŸ˜ƒ

Collapse
 
sarveshh profile image
Sarvesh Patil

This is an amazing post Mohit. Thanks a lot. Saved me a ton of time!

Collapse
 
dhravya profile image
Dhravya

Such an amazing post. Thank you!

Does this work for full domains (like fueler.io/dhravya)

Collapse
 
just_moh_it profile image
Mohit Yadav

Hey! I guess it should, since it's just a simple HTML page... don't know about the subpages though, but they should work with a few modifications in the script!