Danger allows us to add code review specific checks, for example:
PRs guidelines (labels, merge commits)
Highlight critical changes (e.g, updated dependencies, credentials)—we want to make sure reviewers are aware of these changes and won't miss them
Run non-critical, warning-only checks.
We use hooks heavily in development (and even built our own hook manager—Lefthook), mostly for running linters and tests, i.e. something that is required to pass. We do not use Danger for that (although it's possible), we use it as a code review little helper, not guard)
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
We're a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.
Kinda of automatic code (or project) checker plugged into a tool to do automatic code (or project) checks ? That's awesome !
With my team, we just write Git pre-hook scripts, why you don't do that too ? There is no interest to push incomplete things on the server no ?
Danger allows us to add code review specific checks, for example:
We use hooks heavily in development (and even built our own hook manager—Lefthook), mostly for running linters and tests, i.e. something that is required to pass. We do not use Danger for that (although it's possible), we use it as a code review little helper, not guard)