If you're trying to get started with programming with reactive extensions and observable programming, you are going to feel overwhelmed. You're trying to start thinking in a new way, and in some cases in a completely opposite way, than what you have been doing since you started programming.
In this intro, I will do my best to help you get in the right mindset. I will do this by trying to avoid using any of the fancy words you often see attached to Rx. I'll steer away from math theory and terms from research papers and use more common phrases as best I can.
In this intro I'm going to use JavaScript (and some HTML) and RxJS. At this point in time I think all programmers have been exposed to JavaScript at some point and this makes it more or less a universal language. If this is going to affect you, you can try and squint your eyes and pretend it's Java.
Now, let's start learning:
Good, old, regular events
In Rx, it all starts with the observable. We, however, are going to start with events. More specifically, click events. Click events on a button like this in fact:
See the Pen Intro to Rx 01 by Jon Stødle (@jonstodle) on CodePen.
This button doesn't do anything for us at the moment, but it does do something: it generates events. Every time you click the button a click event is fired. We haven't started listening to those events so we're not doing anything when those events fires, but they're still happening.
Even if no one is present to hear a tree fall in the forest, it will still make a sound. The same goes for the button: it will generate click events, even though no one is listening.
Let's start listening. With this button I've added a simple event listener to the click events:
See the Pen Intro to Rx 02 by Jon Stødle (@jonstodle) on CodePen.
The event listener might receive 1 event, or 2 events, or many events. It might even receive no events at all. The user might never click on the button. But when the user does click on the button, we have some instructions how to handle that.
We've now got a button, which is a source of events, an event listener, which let's us get notified of those events, and a handler function, which let's us react to the new events.
This is some basic stuff, you probably know this better than the back of your hand, but now for the plot twist: An observable is a source of signals, an observer let's us get notified of those signals and a next handler let's us react to the new signals.
Let's have a closer look at observables.
Observables
I like to describe an observable as a producer of signals. A signal is just a generic term for something that is emitted by the observable. Just as a DOM element have different kinds of events, an observable has different kinds of signals.
Signals
All signals carry with them a value. It's that value you're actually interested in. Just as an event contains a value with details about the event, a signals contains a value with some kind of data. The kind of data depends on the source of values.
I use the term signal in this intro, but you might see them called values or events in other places. I prefer to use the generic term signal for any kind of output from the observable, and only use values for next signals .
Next signals
The next signal is the most common kind of signal you work with. It's called a next signal, or just next for short, because it represents the next value to be handled.
These signals contain the actual data you want. For observables based on events, this is the event data; for observable based on arrays, this is the values of the array; and for observables based on Promises, this is the result of the promise.
An observable will produce a next signal whenever it has a new value ready.
Error signals
The error signal is only produced when something goes wrong. If some kind of exception happens in an observable, it will produce an error signal.
The value of the error signal is the exception that was thrown.
Complete signals
The complete signal is produced when the observable knows it's not going to produce any more next signals.
If the observable is based on an array, for example, and it has produced a next signal for each of the elements in the array, it will produce a complete signal to notify you that it is done.
The value of the complete signal is void, meaning it doesn't have a value. The complete signal doesn't have any data attached to it.
Creating an observable
The source of the values that makes the observable produce the signals might vary, but you don't have to know the details about the source. The observable is a general abstraction on top of the actual source of values.
This means that you are able to work with signals from different sources in a general manner, and this is part of what makes Rx so powerful. Signals from a range of different sources all look and behave the same when they are delivered through the observable.
It's a bit like how you can iterate over an array, no matter the kind of contents it has. Array is a simple abstraction over a group of values and gives you a common set of methods to use on the items inside it.
While it is possible to create observables manually with the create factory method, I think that should be reserved as intermediate level topic. Not because it's very difficult, but because there are easier (and less error prone) ways to create observables.
While an observable can be it's own source of values, a common way to produce signals is to convert an existing source of values into an observable. Whenever a new value is available from the source, the observable will produce a new next signal for us. To convert a source of values to an observable, we use the family of from*() methods.
The first of these from*() factory methods we're going to look at is fromEvent(). This converts events from an event source to signals in an observable. You specify the source of the events and which event you want to listen to, and fromEvent() will convert those events to signals.
Here's how it's used:
Observable.fromEvent(button, "click");
This is roughly equivalent to this:
button.addEventListener("click");
Note the lack of a handler function in addEventListener(). This is because it exactly mirrors the call to fromEvent(). We're only announcing that we're interested in knowing when there is a new signal or event, but not what to do when we get that signal or event.
We already know how to add a handler to addEventListener(), so we're going to look at how to do it for observables. This is where the we get to observers.
Observers
You very seldom work with observers directly, so I won't go into to too much detail. What you need to know is that an observer is a container for three types of handlers:
next()
When an observable sends a next signal, it is to notify us that it has a new value we want. We receive the value of the next signal as an argument in the handler. We add a handler for next signals by calling subscribe() on the observable we created and pass in the handler:
Observable.fromEvent(button, "click").subscribe(event => {
count++;
output.innerText = "You clicked " + count + " times!";
});
We call this subscribing; you have now subscribed to the observable. The above code is practically the same as this:
button.addEventListener("click", event => {
count++;
output.innerText = "You clicked " + count + " times!";
});
error()
When the observable sends the error signal, something has gone wrong. We handle this by adding a handler as the second argument to subscribe(). We receive the value of the error signal as an argument in the handler.:
Observable.fromEvent(button, "click").subscribe(event => {
count++;
output.innerText = "You clicked " + count + " times!";
},
error => console.log("Something bad happened: " + error);
The above code is kind of like this:
try {
button.addEventListener("click", event => {
count++;
output.innerText = "You clicked " + count + " times!";
});
} catch(error) {
console.log("Something bad happened: " + error);
}
complete()
When an observable is done producing next signals, it will send the complete signal. We can handle this by adding a handler as the third parameter. As complete's value is void, the handler doesn't take any arguments:
Observable.fromEvent(button, "click").subscribe(event => {
count++;
output.innerText = "You clicked " + count + " times!";
},
error => console.log("Something bad happened: " + error),
() => console.log("I'm done."));
The guarantees of an observable
When creating an observable, any observable, you're given a few guarantees. These guarantees relates to how the observable will behave, and the observable will always adhere to them. This makes observables easier and predictable to work with.
1. An observable will produce zero or more next signals
As I mentioned all the way at the top with events: you might not receive any events when adding an event listener, you're just listening in case one or more events are fired.
The same goes for observables: You might not receive any next signals when subscribing. You're just stating your interest in being told if there are any. In most cases you will expect to receive at least one value, but that's not guaranteed.
There are reasons why you might not get a next signal. These reasons are mentioned in the next rules.
2. If an error occurs inside the observable, an error signal will be sent and no further signals will be sent
When something goes wrong inside an observable, an error signal is sent. This includes both when we convert a source of values into an observable and when using operators (which we'll look at later).
The value of the error signal is the error that was generated inside the observable. In our examples so far, we've only looked at simple observable which won't cause an error to occur. If we were doing a web call inside an observable, the web call might error out. In that case we would receive an error signal containing the appropriate error.
3. When the observable has no more next signals to produce, it will send a complete signal and no further signals will be sent
When you subscribe, you don't know how many next signals you are going to receive (see guarantee #1). The observable will tell you if it knows there are no more next signals to be produced. It will then send a complete signal.
It's possible to create an observable from an array. When the observable has produced a next signal for each of the items in the array, it sends a complete signal to notify the subscriber that it's done producing values.
In the case of the event observable, you will never receive a complete signal. Events are never really done; there might always be one more. As the observable might produce more values, it will not send a complete signal either.
Subscribing to observables
Remember that an observable is just an abstraction on top of a source that produces signals. In this case we've seen how to convert an event source to an observable, but as mentioned, the family of from*() methods can convert many different things to an observable.
-
fromPromise()converts a JavaScript promise to an observable. -
from()takes an array, or an array-like object, and converts each item into a next signal in the resulting observable.
As all of these creates observables. This means you can also handle the next signals in a common way. Let's extract the handler from before into a separate function and change the output text:
function handleNext(nextValue){
count++;
output.innerText = "You have received " + count + " next signals!";
}
I've also changed the output to be a bit more generic. We can then pass it into the subscribe() method:
Observable.fromEvent(button, "click").subscribe(handleNext);
This will produce the same behavior. We're now able to reuse that handler for other observables too. Let's create an observable from an array:
const numbers = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5];
Observable.from(numbers);
We can put this together with our button handler and handleNext() from before:
Observable.fromEvent(button, "click").subscribe(handleNext);
Observable.from(numbers).subscribe(handleNext);
And here's the result:
See the Pen Intro to Rx 03 by Jon Stødle (@jonstodle) on CodePen.
You should see "You have received 5 next signals!" immediately. When converting the numbers array to an observable, the next signals are produced immediately. The method receives the array, goes through it, one item at the time, and produces a next signal for each of them. handleNext() is called for each next signal.
If you click the button, the count will continue as the same handler is used for the next signals produced by the click events on the button.
Hot and cold observables
This leads us nicely into the concept of hot and cold observables. You'll see this mentioned a lot of places, especially people asking what the difference is. I hope that you, with your knowledge of the different observables we have created so far (the event observable and the array observable), will grasp this concept.
By default, an observable is cold. This means it will not produce any values before you call subscribe() on it. Just as a regular function won't return a value before you call it, an observable will not produce a signal before you subscribe to it.
This is how the array observable works. When we first call Observable.from(numbers), no next signal is sent. We're just preparing the observable for later use. When we call subscribe() on the observable, it kicks into action and starts producing next signals for each of the items in the array:
const numbersObservable = Observable.from(numbers); // No next signal is produced
numbersObservable.subscribe(handleNext); // Next signals start being produced
A hot observable, on the other hand, produces values regardless whether you call subscribe() or not. This is how events work, for example. As I mentioned earlier, just because you're not listening to the click events on a button, doesn't mean they're not being fired.
When we call Observable.fromEvent(button, "click"), next signals are being produced every time we click the button. When we subscribe to it, we will receive all next signals produced from that point forward. All the next signals produced before that moment in time are lost. This is just like events.
In short, cold observables are like regular functions, which only produce values when called: they will not produce signals before subscribe() is called.
Hot observables are like events, which produces values regardless if anyone is listening: they will produce next signals from the moment they are created, regardless if you call subscribe() or not.
While observables should be cold by default, you still get hot observables sometimes.
This is often true when converting a source of values into an observable. This is the case with fromEvent() and fromPromise() for example.
A weakness in Rx is that there's no way to tell whether an observable is hot or cold by just looking at the declaration. You either have to know if it's hot or cold (as we know fromEven() observables are), or you have to subscribe to it and see what happens.
This sounds like a major drawback, and some say it is, but in 95% of the cases the outcome is predictable. Just be prepared to be surprised by a hot observable once in a while.
Subscriptions
When subscribing to an observable, the subscribe() will return a token representing that subscription. This token has a single method you can call: unsubscribe().
Note:
unsubscribe()is calleddispose()in RxJS 4 and other implementations of Rx.
By calling unsubscribe() you tell the observable that you're no longer interested in new signals. This will make the observable shut down and clean up. If the observable has allocated objects they will be marked for clean up and asynchronous actions will be aborted.
unsubscribe() will not make the observable produce a complete signal. Complete signals are the observable's way of telling the subscriber it's done producing new values; unsubscribe() is the subscriber telling the observable that it's no longer interested in any signals.
Any time you know you're not interested in any more signals, you should always unsubscribe. This makes sure that the observable isn't doing any sort of work (potentially heavy work) in the background, that you're not interested in.
Automatic clean up
When an observable has finished doing it's work, and sends a complete signal, it will also clean up after itself. That means if you receive a complete signal, you don't have to call unsubscribe(); the same clean up routine is done by the observable automatically.
If an error occurs inside an observable (or one of the operators) and it produces an error signal, the observable cleans up after itself the same way it does after a complete signal.
Operators
Operators is probably the scariest and most overwhelming subject when getting started with Rx. In RxJS alone there are over 60 operators! That's a lot to swallow when starting out. I'm here to tell you two things:
First, you don't have to remember all the operators to get started with Rx. In reality you only need to concern yourself with a handful or two. Later, when you either need or want to, you can expand by looking into new operators.
Second, I'm going to go through the operators I see get used again and again. These are the ones you'll most likely need when you start using Rx.
Before we get into the operators, I'll explain how they work:
Up until now, we've only subscribed directly to the observable and handled the different signals. Operators let's us modify the observable before subscribing to it. We can filter out signals we're not interested in, or change the value of a next signal before we receive it in our next handler.
The official description of operators is a bit more technical, but I like to think of operators in two mental models. I'm going to explain them both below. I want you to ignore the operators themselves and just focus on the explanation. What the operators actually do will be explained in detail later.
The modified observable model
This mental model considers an observable and all it's operators as a single unit. In the end you're left with an observable which you subscribe to.
Consider an observable that's based on the click events on a button:
const buttonClicks = Observable.fromEvent(button, "click");
We want to modify the next signal values produced by the observable. We add an operator:
const buttonClicks = Observable.fromEvent(button, "click")
.map(myMappingFunction); // Don't worry about what this means. We'll get back to it
buttonClicks is still an observable, the operators return the original observable with the operator applied to it. To the subscriber it still looks like an observable without an operator attached to; all it sees is an observable of some kind.
The observable will still produce signals when the button is clicked. That has not changed. What has changed are the values of the next signals.
Subscribing to the observable is exactly the same as before:
buttonClicks.subscribe(handleNext);
We could add even more operators to the observable to modify it even further:
const buttonClicks = Observable.fromEvent(button, "click")
.map(myMappingFunction) // Again, ignore all the operators, we'll get back to all of this afterwords
.filter(myFilteringFunction)
.mergeMap(myMergeMappingFunction)
.take(myTakeValue);
buttonClicks is still just observable. You subscribe to it as you normally would. The signals it produces has changed greatly, but the observable is still just an observable.
As I mentioned earlier: The observable is a general abstraction on top of the actual source of values. In addition to abstracting away the source of the values, the observable can also modify the values before sending them to the subscribe().
The operators let's you customise how the observable should modify the values.
The pipeline model
This mental model considers the observable as a source of values, the operators as a pipeline and the subscribe as a handler.
Let's look at the same observable as before:
const buttonClicks = Observable.fromEvent(button, "click");
When working with operators, it's common practice to write each operator on a new line, aligning the dots. While this helps readability (especially with long operator chains), it also creates a nice visual for this mental model.
Operators can be applied to any observable, so let's show an alternate way of changing the next signal values before receiving them in the subscribe().
buttonClicks
.map(myMappingFunction)
.subscribe(handleNext);
The pipeline model looks at it this way:
-
buttonClicksproduces a value - The value is passed down to the next step in the pipeline:
map() -
map()changes the value -
map()passes the value down to the next step in the pipeline:subscribe() -
subscribe()handles the value
In this model, the value starts at the top and is passed down, one step at the time. Each step is an operator. The operator executes some operation and passes the value on. At the bottom the value is handled by subscribe().
The pipeline model is probably the most common mental model of how operators work. You'll often see "the pipeline" referenced when talking about Rx. I think some might grasp it better with the modified observable model, however.
It's completely up to you how you choose to think about it; whatever works for you.
Operator explanations
Most operators take a function as it's first argument. The function receives one value as an argument and returns a value. To put it in code, this is the function you pass in to an operator:
function(inValue) {
// Do some work
return newValue;
}
// OR
inValue => {
// Do some work
return newValue;
}
The inValue you receive is the value of a next signal. When you add an operator to an observable, the value of the next signal is passed to each of the operators in turn.
Inside each operator (with some few exceptions) you've supplied a function which takes the next signal's value, do some kind of operation or evaluation, and return a new value. The new value is then passed to the next operator in the pipeline.
To get a feel of how this works, let's look at an operator and how to use it.
map
The map operator takes a function which receives a value and returns a value. You use this operator to convert values. The value you receive is the value of a next signal, and the value you return is often based on the value received.
Let's look at some code. Here's our good old buttonClicks:
const buttonClicks = Observable.fromEvent(button, "click");
The next signal values from observables based on events are an object containing information about the event.
Let's add this code to test it:
buttonClicks.subscribe(value => output.innerText += value + "\n");
See the Pen Intro to Rx 04 by Jon Stødle (@jonstodle) on CodePen.
On the event object there's a property called target which refers to the DOM object the event was fired by. We want to change our observable's next signal values to be the DOM object that fired the event. To do this, we use the map operator:
.map(event => { return event.target;Â })
We receive the next signal value from the observable, and simply return the target property on the event. Let's test this:
See the Pen Intro to Rx 05 by Jon Stødle (@jonstodle) on CodePen.
Still; this isn't very interesting information. Let's get the text of the button from the DOM object:
.map(event => event.target.innerText)
See the Pen Intro to Rx 06 by Jon Stødle (@jonstodle) on CodePen.
We can do pretty much whatever we want inside the map operator, as long as we return a value. We could for example split the text inside the button and return an array containing the lengths of the different words:
.map(event => {
const text = event.target.innerText;
const textParts = text.split(" ");
let returnArray = [];
for(let i = 0; i < textParts.length; i++) {
returnArray.push(textParts[i].length);
}
return returnArray;
})
See the Pen Intro to Rx 07 by Jon Stødle (@jonstodle) on CodePen.
We can even disregard the value we receive entirely, and return anything we like:
.map(_ => "Something completely different!")
See the Pen Intro to Rx 08 by Jon Stødle (@jonstodle) on CodePen.
Note that we assign the value we receive to _. This is common practice in functional programming to signify that we don't care about the value and that we're not going to use it. Underscore is often called discard when used like this.
filter
The filter operator takes a value and returns a boolean. If the function returns true, the value passed in will be passed on to the next operator in the chain. If the function returns false, the value passed in will not be passed to the next operator in the chain.
You can think of filter as an if statement. If true, continue; if false, stop.
To explain, we'll reuse the buttonClicks and the map operator we've just learned: we map each click to the current amount of milliseconds since epoch (01.01.1970), and then filter to only let signals with an even value through:
.map(_ => Date.now())
.filter(milliseconds => milliseconds % 2 == 0)
See the Pen Intro to Rx 09 by Jon Stødle (@jonstodle) on CodePen.
When you click the button, you'll only get a new value when you happen to click on an even amount of milliseconds since 01.01.1970. You may have to click a few times before getting a new value.
As with map, filter can be as simple or complex as you want it.
combineLatest
To work with combineLatest, we're going to introduce a new observable:
const ticks = Observable.interval(1000);
This observable will produce a new next signal every 1000 milliseconds (e.g. every second). The value of the next signal is 0 for the first signal, 1 for second signal, 2 for the third, and so on.
See the Pen Intro to Rx 10 by Jon Stødle (@jonstodle) on CodePen.
With combineLatest you can combine the values of two observables. The resulting observable after combineLatest will produce a new signal every time either one of the two original observable produce a signal. The value of the next signal from combineLatest is an array containing the most recent value from each of the original observables:
See the Pen Intro to Rx 11 by Jon Stødle (@jonstodle) on CodePen.
As you can see, combineLatest will not produce any values until each of the original observables has produced at least one value. You will only start seeing a value when you click the button. The ticks observable have been producing new values regardless of you clicking on the button, which means the first value you see might not be 1,0, but the most recent value produced by both observables.
combineLatest also supports a mapping function as the second argument. This function will receive two arguments; the two values from the array. We can then transform the two values into something more useful:
.combineLatest(ticks, (clickCount, tickCount) => `${clickCount} + ${tickCount} = ${clickCount + tickCount}`)
See the Pen Intro to Rx 12 by Jon Stødle (@jonstodle) on CodePen.
It is worth noting that it's preferable to supply the mapping function as an argument to combineLatest, instead of using a map() after it. There is a small performance benefit when doing this. Also, I think it expresses your intent better.
merge
merge will literally merge the next signals of two observables into one observable. The resulting observable after the merge operator will produce the same next signals the two original observables produce, at the same time the original observables produce them.
Let's see how this works in practice. Here we combine the ticks and buttonClicks to create a new observable. This new observable will produce the same values that the two original observables produce:
.merge(ticks)
See the Pen Intro to Rx 13 by Jon Stødle (@jonstodle) on CodePen.
When ticks produces a new value, it will be displayed. When buttonClicks produces a new value, it will be displayed.
mergeMap
This operator is actually a combination of a map and a merge, hence the name mergeMap. This operator was previously called, and is still called in other language implementations of Rx, flatMap.
The function you pass into this operator is a mapping function. You receive the next signal value as an argument and you return an observable. The observable you return will be merged into original observable.
For each of the next signal values you receive in the mergeMap you will produce a new observable. This new observable will produce entirely new next signal values. The resulting observable after the mergeMap will produce next signals when all of the observables returned inside the mergeMap produces next signals.
Let's remove the ticks observable and just focus on the buttonClicks observable and it's map:
buttonClicks
.map(_ => {
count++;
return count;
})
This observable will produce the values 1, 2, 3, etc. for each button click.
Next, we're going to create a new interval observable based on the values produced by the buttonClicks.map() observable:
.mergeMap(clickCount => // 1
Observable.interval(clickCount * 1000) // 2
.map(value => `${clickCount * 1000}-interval has ticked ${value + 1} times`)) // 3
Let's go through this code:
- We receive the clickCount from the
buttonClicks.map()observable. - We create an interval observable which will tick every number of seconds equal to
clickCount(ifclickCountis3, it will tick every 3 seconds). - We then change the interval observable next signal value to a string telling us how many times that specific interval observable has ticked (remember that the interval observable starts at
0, which is why we have to add1:value + 1).
This Observable.interval().map() observable will then be merged into the original observable - the original observable being the buttonClicks.map() observable.
Again, for each button click, count is incremented by 1 and passed to the mergeMap. mergeMap then produces an Observable.interval().map() observable which will produce a new next signal every number of seconds equal to the clickCount. The Observable.interval().map() observable is then merged into the buttonClicks observable.
All Observable.interval().map() observables ever produced inside the mergeMap (as a result of a next signal from buttonClicks) will be merged together. The resulting observable after the mergeMap will produce next signals every time one of the merged observables produces a next signal.
I'm repeating myself multiple times here on purpose. Getting a grasp on mergeMap is a very essential part of programming in Rx. If you manage to come up with solutions using mergeMap on your own, you've probably started to finally "get it"â„¢.
mergeMap is one of the toughest operators to "get". Partly because it's sometimes difficult to wrap your head around these "higher order" operators, but also because you always encounter it early on when learning Rx.
There are more operators that behave similarly to mergeMap, but you usually don't start using those before you've started "getting" Rx.
Having worked yourself through the whole mergeMap section, I'd encourage you to go through it once more to see if you understand it better the second time. Knowing what you now know, might help you understand the first text better.
switchMap
switchMap is very similar to mergeMap: it takes a function which receives the next signal value as an argument and returns an observable.
The difference is that instead of merging all the observables produced inside it, switchMap will only produce next signals when the most recent observable returned produces signals. The second most recent observable will be unsubscribed to and discarded.
If we look at the same code as we did with mergeMap, but switch out the mergeMap:
.switchMap(clickCount =>
Observable.interval(clickCount * 1000)
.map(value => `${clickCount * 1000}-interval has ticked ${value + 1} times`))
See the Pen Intro to Rx 15 by Jon Stødle (@jonstodle) on CodePen.
The observable after the switchMap will only produce next signals when the most recent observable returned inside it produces a next signal. This is in contrast to mergeMap which produces a next signal every time all of the observables returned inside it produce a next signal.
In other words: every time you click the button, switchMap will call unsubscribe() on the previous observable it returned and only produce next signals when the new observable produces next signals.
take
This operators will let you limit an observable to a maximum number of next signals. This is useful if you're working with an observable which never completes (like Observable.fromEvent()), but you only want a specific number of next signals.
When the limit is reached, take will unsubscribe to the observable it is called on, but the subscribe() will receive a complete signal from take.
Let's say we want to start an interval observable when the button is clicked and hide the button. We're only interested in one next signal from the button, so we use take to limit it. This will make sure that the subscription to buttonClicks is cleaned up when we don't need it anymore.
We then use a switchMap to subscribe to the single interval observable. Even though the take will cause buttonClicks to send a complete signal, the observable we return inside switchMap will continue to produce values and therefore keep the observable alive:
buttonClicks
.take(1)
.switchMap(_ => {
button.style.opacity = 0;
return Observable.interval(1000);
})
See the Pen Intro to Rx 16 by Jon Stødle (@jonstodle) on CodePen.
catch
If an exception is raised inside an observable, you'll be notified in the error handler inside your subscribe(). Sometimes though you'd rather want a next signal with an empty or default value instead.
catch takes a function which receives the exception and it returns an observable. The returned observable will replace the original observable.
The original observable has sent an error signal, which means it will not be able to send any more signals. catch will stop that error signal and pass it into the function. It then merges the returned observable into the original observable. In the subscribe it will look like the original observable stopped producing next signals and that the returned observable took over.
To explain catch we're going to use trusty old buttonClicks and Observable.from():
const buttonClicks = Observable.fromEvent(button, "click");
const numbers = Observable.from([1, 2, 3, 4]);
We're then going to raise an exception on purpose inside a map:
.map(_ => {
count++;
if(count === 3) {
throw "Count is 3!";
}
return count;
})
.catch(error => numbers)
See the Pen Intro to Rx 17 by Jon Stødle (@jonstodle) on CodePen.
When we click the button for the third time, an exception is raised. The catch will stop the error signal and replace it with the numbers observable.
You'll notice that the button stops working after the exception has been raised. This is because buttonClicks has produced an error signal. This is in keeping with the guarantees of an observable: when an error signal has been produced, no further signals will be produced.
This is seldom what you want, so what you do is use catch on an observable you return inside a mergeMap or a switchMap. When that returned observable raises an exception, catch will stop the error signal from merging into the original observable, and instead merge the observable that is returned inside the catch.
In the following example we return an interval observable inside a switchMap. The interval observable produces the same number of values as the number of clicks on the button. If the button has been clicked three times, the interval observable produces three values.
If the interval observable produces four values (0, 1, 2, 3), the map will raise an exception when it sees the 3. This makes the interval observable send an error signal, which catch stops and replaces with the numbers observable.
.switchMap(clickCount =>
Observable.interval(100)
.take(clickCount)
.map(value => {
if(value === 3) {
throw "Value is 3!";
}
return value;
})
.catch(error => numbers))
See the Pen Intro to Rx 18 by Jon Stødle (@jonstodle) on CodePen.
Conclusion
If you've read the whole thing through: Congratulations! 🎉
Getting through this considerable wall of text when you're getting started with Rx is tough. I sincerely hope you've gained some understanding of how to use Rx. I didn't want to get too technical and rather get you in a mindset where you can start to reason about how to use Rx in practice.
This intro won't show the solutions, but it (hopefully) shows how to use Rx to reach a solution.
I'm going to leave you with a suggestion:
Read through the whole thing one more time. Maybe wait a few days - and read it again.
This might seem a bit demotivating, but as I mentioned in the section on mergeMap: going back and reading the first parts with the new knowledge you now know, may help you understand those parts better; which again leads to understanding the last parts better.
If you still have any sort of question, feel free to ask in the comments or on Twitter.
Happy coding!
This post was originally published on blog.jonstodle.com
Top comments (0)