Hans... for me, it's other approach than normalizr, but I think it's a lot of verbose for a reducer.
Did you try to pass a complexity level checker?
BTW, I like the normalizr approach, it's a pity that normalizr was discontinued.
@joaozitopolo Yes this approach is more verbose than just using normalizr, but it's for those that prefer a more functional approach using higher-kinded types. To each their own :)
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
We're a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.
Hans... for me, it's other approach than normalizr, but I think it's a lot of verbose for a reducer.
Did you try to pass a complexity level checker?
BTW, I like the normalizr approach, it's a pity that normalizr was discontinued.
@joaozitopolo Yes this approach is more verbose than just using normalizr, but it's for those that prefer a more functional approach using higher-kinded types. To each their own :)