DEV Community

loading...

Discussion on: TailwindCSS: Adds complexity, does nothing.

Collapse
jacobherrington profile image
Jacob Herrington (he/him) • Edited

It's sort of ironic that the site this is posted on took inspiration from Tailwind in our own approach to CSS!

I got a whiff of it and quickly learned the name is appropos: it was as welcome and useful as passed gas.

It's entirely possible that was actually me. I produce a potent musk.

It literally provides no value, and tons of problems.

I respectfully disagree! Personally, Tailwind solves a lot of problems for me. For one thing: CSS is magic and I refuse to listen to anyone that thinks they can explain it to me because I might get hexed in the process. A tool like Tailwind keeps me safe from the dark arts (this is why I always burn sage when talking to @pp ).

More generally, I think critiquing Open Source tools for their issues is fair (especially if those critiques are attached to a PR!), but we also have to be mindful of the limits of our own perspective.

As a CSS or front-end expert with a team of engineers to back you up, Tailwind might not be the best choice, but that doesn't describe all of us. When I build a landing page for a charity organization (I'm not billing, I can't handcraft all the CSS for this thing), I'm definitely using Tailwind or something quite similar. Tailwind is a great solution for those solo indie hackers out there; it improves productivity and abstracts a source of complexity that not everyone has the time or aptitude to dive into!

Another way to phrase it: more or less these points would also apply to Rails or Laravel, but those frameworks solve a lot of problems.

If so, why are we considering replacing CSS with something that does less, is more complex, creates bad quality codebases, and possibly ends up with massive vendor-lock in down the line?

I'm not sure anyone wants to replace CSS with Tailwind! That sure is some all-or-nothing thinking (I learned about that in therapy, hell yeah)!

You use the example of Assembly and C, but I think this is more like C and Ruby; I'm not a C developer, as much as I try to learn about it, but I can build some pretty cool stuff really quickly with Ruby. Of course, the stuff I build in Ruby is going to have some weaknesses for having used that abstraction, but if I didn't use Ruby I probably wouldn't ever get the code to compile anyway.

However, I can go ask some friends who know C or Rust or something similar to extend my Ruby code when it really needs that performance boost!

Maybe one day, I'll have to re-write my Ruby, but that's a problem for millionaire Jacob. He has more users and paying customers than his little Ruby app can handle.

Tailwind doesn't stop you from cracking out that hellish CSS abomination whenever you want! When my Tailwind implementation makes something difficult I'll hire a warlock to summon whatever void-being we need to fix my layout.

While we disagree, I'm glad we can have a discussion about it. Maybe you're right; if people find this article searching for more context around Tailwind, they will find a lot of opinions (and the strong stench that comes with a multitude of opinions).

However, for now, I think the enlightened 21st-century philosopher-king Jason Mraz penned it more directly than I can every hope to: "You do you and I'll do me."