Let me explain the difference between these two indexing operations in a positional embedding context:
-
self.pe[:, :x.size(1)]
:- This selects ALL rows (first
:
) - But only the first
x.size(1)
columns - Typically used when you want to slice the positional embedding to match the sequence length of your input tensor
- Assumes
self.pe
has shape (embedding_dim, max_sequence_length) - Useful in scenarios where you have a fixed positional embedding matrix and want to extract embeddings for the current input's sequence length
- This selects ALL rows (first
-
self.pe[:x.size(0), :]
:- This selects the first
x.size(0)
rows - But ALL columns (second
:
) - Typically used when you want to slice the positional embedding to match the batch size of your input tensor
- Assumes
self.pe
has shape (max_batch_size, embedding_dim) - Useful in scenarios where you have a fixed positional embedding matrix and want to extract embeddings for the current batch size
- This selects the first
The key differences are:
- They slice different dimensions of the positional embedding matrix
- They are used in different contexts depending on the shape of your positional embedding matrix and how you want to extract embeddings
Here's a quick example to illustrate:
import torch
# Scenario 1: PE with shape (embedding_dim, max_seq_length)
# Slicing to match sequence length
pe1 = torch.randn(512, 100) # 512 embedding dim, max 100 sequence length
x1 = torch.randn(32, 50, 512) # batch_size=32, seq_length=50, embedding_dim=512
sliced_pe1 = pe1[:, :x1.size(1)] # Will be (512, 50)
# Scenario 2: PE with shape (max_batch_size, embedding_dim)
# Slicing to match batch size
pe2 = torch.randn(64, 512) # max 64 batch size, 512 embedding dim
x2 = torch.randn(32, 100, 512) # batch_size=32, seq_length=100, embedding_dim=512
sliced_pe2 = pe2[:x2.size(0), :] # Will be (32, 512)
The choice between these two depends on:
- The shape of your positional embedding matrix
- How you want to extract positional embeddings relative to your input tensor
- The specific implementation of your positional embedding strategy
Top comments (0)