Even if you've never heard of vanity metrics before, you know what they are. They're the thumbs up, hearts, and likes that you see across practical...
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
Polywork is not planning to have "likes/reactions" and it had me wondering recently how that affects discoverability or how would one engineer a system that helps with fair or good discoverbility?
I just posted an article the other day on DEV which I have not done in a while, and my primary goal was to get enough reactions within the first hour to get trending so I had any chance of people seeing the article, while it did not reach that goal, people were saying they read it on twitter (instead of just likes) and so that was my metric of impact.
I suppose search engines have been doing it (discoverability) for a long time, though I'm guessing for social platform you'd want to use a classification ML model to say this article goes to these tags, and you could build an ML model to determine the quality to help give articles a boost and then let commentors or page interactions be the defining metric.
Human-assistance is an option for good article curration and I did about 30 mins of DEV moderation for AWS tag yesterday.I just got tired and was thinking, an AI-assistant could cut this down to 90% so the human can focus on uplifting the good stuff.
I'd like to see DEV just get rid of reactions, or at least have them not determine the timefeed. I think this could help cut down on the buzzfeed list-like content.
I really like reading your articles Helen, especailly since right now I've been diving so much into data business intelligence tools. Hope to see you at re:Invent permitting the worlds current circuumstances and mother gia allows.
Thanks for your post on Polywork Andrew. I'm also interested to see how the platform is received.
Is PolyWork the new LinkedIn for Developers?
Andrew Brown 🇨🇦 ・ Jun 17 ・ 6 min read
I'm crossing my fingers that the world is not on fire in December and we get to re:Invent. This may be the year we meet in person :D
Never heard of polywork. I just signed up and waiting to get in.
I love when a post I wrote a year ago suddenly gets a comment or a reaction.
Those are the ones that feel important and genuine because they truly helped someone that was looking.
It also reinforces the idea that the content I write isn't just to get some quick views and forget about. It's there to help others - even if that's only 1 person a year from now.
I agree, it's a great feeling when those posts get recognition after I think they've faded away from timelines. In my experience they often come with a comment and start a conversation which is even better.
Thanks a lot Helen, I tend to obsess in my bad days to obsess on the views of my successful posts and be disappointed by my non successful posts, and that's energy wasted that could be redirected into writing more articles.
I think genuine conversations is the right metric.
I've had the same experiences where posts I've put a lot of time into don't get a lot of views, and posts I've put together quickly get many more.
It's much more enjoyable to have those conversations with those reading my posts rather than trying to figure out why the page views are what they are so I'm doing my best to ignore the numbers.
Just as you have eluded to, views != Impact 🙅
Reading this as I just logged in to see view count on my last post. 😀
Great post! I've added the #meta and #techtalks tags to it as it fits those categories too.
Great article. Ironically, I just recently learned about vanity metrics while reading The Lean Start up and the books perspective on these types of metrics aligns with your article. It's easy to fall into the false notion that page hits (as an example) represents true user engagement.
I put most emphasis on the discussion. I get the most value from a good discussion, and its a good sign that the article impacted someone in a good way.
I've taken all trackers off of my personal website so the only thing I can see is click rates from google. This one is definitely in that vanity category, but can give me something to go off to see what articles get picked up and how I might get others to get picked up.
One issue I have had is co-workers will ask me a question about something they have been trying to figure out for days. Often something adjacent to our work like bash or tmux setup. I'll share an article with them and get a response, "this is exactly what I was looking for how did this not show up in the 100 google searches I just did?".
This is the main reason I care about seo, hitting numbers is cool I guess, but being able to help out someone without even having any active input is super cool.
That's a really good point. Humans like big numbers, and so do the search engine algorithms.
It's disappointing to see so many 'clickbaity' articles bubbling up to the top of search results in favour of genuine ones. All the more reason to be a part of the community and sharing your knowledge personally with those who can benefit from what you've learned.
I do check the stats of my own articles, but it is not something I pay a lot of attention to, what I have found out really brings me joy is when people comment. I do not care if people disagree, just clap my shoulder or share something, which broadens the perspective - I just really appreciate comments.
The comments are definitely the most rewarding part of sharing knowledge. Those lightbulb moments when someone has grasped a concept because of how you've explained it are priceless.