Accessibility First DevRel. I focus on ensuring content created, events held and company assets are as accessible as possible, for as many people as possible.
Go on, be honest, how many of you actually knew about the "anti-follow" bit. Maybe it is obvious (maybe it is even explained when you sign up....I am terrible at following onboarding stuff!) but I only stumbled across it a couple of weeks ago!
Accessibility First DevRel. I focus on ensuring content created, events held and company assets are as accessible as possible, for as many people as possible.
Accessibility First DevRel. I focus on ensuring content created, events held and company assets are as accessible as possible, for as many people as possible.
Hehe I did wonder if anyone heavily involved in DEV would not know about it π, kind of wanted Ben to turn up and go "when the hell did we add this?" π€£
Accessibility First DevRel. I focus on ensuring content created, events held and company assets are as accessible as possible, for as many people as possible.
I've been a professional C, Perl, PHP and Python developer.
I'm an ex-sysadmin from the late 20th century.
These days I do more Javascript and CSS and whatnot, and promote UX and accessibility.
I knew - ish.
Last I'd heard, you couldn't set a negative value because the search query didn't work that way, but you could set a low (0.001) value and follow pretty much every other tag.
This seems like a good change, though making it controlled by a "see less of this tag" or even a "mute" button would be good progress.
Accessibility First DevRel. I focus on ensuring content created, events held and company assets are as accessible as possible, for as many people as possible.
Not a bad idea of βsee lessβ, although being developers weightings work, perhaps as forem evolves they will change it to a scale of 1-5 and introduce your "see less" idea to make things less techy as different communities start using FOREM!
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
We're a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.
Go on, be honest, how many of you actually knew about the "anti-follow" bit. Maybe it is obvious (maybe it is even explained when you sign up....I am terrible at following onboarding stuff!) but I only stumbled across it a couple of weeks ago!
Now if they just introduced an "anti-listicles" feature, I would have the perfect home feed! π
I did not know this. Thank you :)
Not a problem at all, glad it isn't just me! :-)
I knew π
Hehe I did wonder if anyone heavily involved in DEV would not know about it π, kind of wanted Ben to turn up and go "when the hell did we add this?" π€£
If I remember correctly it was Ben that added the feature π .
That doesn't necessarily mean he remembers doing it!
I have loads of older projects where I go "this would be a good idea", go look at implementing it and I already added it 3 years ago π€£
I knew - ish.
Last I'd heard, you couldn't set a negative value because the search query didn't work that way, but you could set a low (0.001) value and follow pretty much every other tag.
This seems like a good change, though making it controlled by a "see less of this tag" or even a "mute" button would be good progress.
Not a bad idea of βsee lessβ, although being developers weightings work, perhaps as forem evolves they will change it to a scale of 1-5 and introduce your "see less" idea to make things less techy as different communities start using FOREM!