No problem and thank you for catching that typo! I’ll add the subhead in the original code shortly. :)
Could you elaborate on how it would not be semantic? To my understanding, text that summarizes or leads into a topic specific block of text, would be a good candidate for headline tags. And the less impactful a headline is to the main subject, the smaller designation it would get. (From h1-h6).
But eager to learn something new about it if that understanding is not correct. Thanks!
I agree with what you said, but the word "subtitle" is what bugs me. Headings should use the h1-h6 tags, yet subheadings (or subtitles) should be put in a regular p tags. So imho either the text inside your h2 is wrong or the h2 itself is.
Ah, that makes sense now. I can see how "subhead/subtitle" could communicate something different.
My intention was for a "level 2 headline/title" vs text that follows a headline/title. I agree that in the latter case a <p> tag would be better served. :)
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
We're a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.
No problem and thank you for catching that typo! I’ll add the subhead in the original code shortly. :)
Could you elaborate on how it would not be semantic? To my understanding, text that summarizes or leads into a topic specific block of text, would be a good candidate for headline tags. And the less impactful a headline is to the main subject, the smaller designation it would get. (From
h1-h6).But eager to learn something new about it if that understanding is not correct. Thanks!
I agree with what you said, but the word "subtitle" is what bugs me. Headings should use the h1-h6 tags, yet subheadings (or subtitles) should be put in a regular p tags. So imho either the text inside your h2 is wrong or the h2 itself is.
Ah, that makes sense now. I can see how "subhead/subtitle" could communicate something different.
My intention was for a "level 2 headline/title" vs text that follows a headline/title. I agree that in the latter case a
<p>tag would be better served. :)