DEV Community

Cover image for Higher Order Functions in Swift

Higher Order Functions in Swift

fosteman profile image Timothy Fosteman Updated on ・2 min read

Parameterizing behaviour with functions in other HOCs

These transforming HOCs like map, filter are so useful for the reason of them having the transformation function acting inside, specified by the programmer.

This pattern of parameterized behaviour is found throughout the standard library. Array, and other collections, have several useful HOCs

  • map and flatMap transform elements
  • filter include only certain elements
  • allSatisfy test all elements for condition
  • reduce fold the elements into an aggregate value
  • sort(by:),sorted(by:), lexicographicallyPrecedes(_:by:), and partition(by:) all reorder elements
recipes.sort {$0.prepTime < $1.prepTime }

recipes.sort { $0.label.uppercased() < $1.label.uppercased() }

  • forEach visit each element
  • firstIndex(where:), lastIndex(where:), first(where:), last(where:), and contains(where:) answer "Does element exist ?"
bulletproofRice.ingredients.contains { $0.ingredient == "Raw Honey" }
  • min(by:), max(by:) find the minimum or maximum of all elements
  • elementsEqual(_:by:) and starts(with:by:) compare elements of collections
  • split(whereSeparator:) break up the elements into multiple arrays
  • prefix(while:) take elements from the start as long as the condition holds true
  • drop(while:) drop elements until the condition holds true, return the rest. The inverse function of prefix
  • removeAll(where:) remove the elements matching the condition
  • accumulate combine elements into an array. Alike reduce, but returns multiple times after each action.
  • count(where:) count the number of elements that match
  • indices(where:) return a list of indices matching the condition. Alike firstIndex but doesn't halt on the first.
  • zip(sequence1:sequence2:) create a sequence of pairs built out of two underlying sequences.
Consider my Wild-Caught oneliner
let numbers: [Int] = [0, 1, 1, 2, 3, 4, 4]
var result: [[Int]] = numbers.isEmpty ? [] : [[numbers[0]]]
//Wild-Caught one-liner
for (previous, current) in zip(numbers, numbers.dropFirst()) {
    previous == current ? result[result.endIndex - 1].append(current) : result.append([current])
result // [[0], [1, 1], [2], [3], [4, 4]]

What it does, or, I think it does, is splits an array into groups of adjacent equal elements.
If to put it succinctly into an extension

extension Array {
func split(where condition: (Element, Element) -> Bool) -> [[Element]] {
    var result: [[Element]] = numbers.isEmpty ? [] : [[self[0]]]
        for (previous, current) in zip(self, self.dropFirst()) {
            if condition(previous, current) {
            else {
                result[result.endIndex - 1].append(current)
        return result

result = numbers.split { $0 != $1 }
result // [[0], [1, 1], [2], [3], [4, 4]]
result = numbers.split(where: !=)
result // same result

The overall idea is to remove as much of boilerplate as possible. Several of these functions have default implementation: sort, for example, sorts in ascension; contains takes a value to check for.

That's the satori of modern programming languages.


Editor guide