What's something you feel is missing in Code Reviews & PRs?
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
Try REST API Generation for Snowflake
DevOps for Private APIs. Automate the building, securing, and documenting of internal/private REST APIs with built-in enterprise security on bare-metal, VMs, or containers.
- Auto-generated live APIs mapped from Snowflake database schema
- Interactive Swagger API documentation
- Scripting engine to customize your API
- Built-in role-based access control
Read next
AI Model Beats GPT-4 at Financial Reasoning with New Training Method
aimodels-fyi -
AI Breakthrough: Speech Models Can Now See and Discuss Images Without Text Conversion
aimodels-fyi -
Resolving dpkg Lock Contention in Ubuntu Deployments
Yulin -
AI breakthrough unifies 3D generation and understanding with compressed spatial tokens for better performance
aimodels-fyi -
Top comments (4)
I feel that we have the basics already well covered like test automation. One thing that is possible but rarely implemented is to be able to connect to a temporary running environment that would have the changes introduced by the PR.
I have it in my current job and had it in the previous. Honestly, it's a bit hard for me to imagine living without it now (maybe not for every PR, but at least for some of them).
imo the ideal PR should have a summary description of what the change is about .So, that ppl(even non-tech) can understand without drilling down to the respective task and it should have a snapshot embedded image /script to show the test coverage of the implementation for a decent change.
With the advancement of open ai fine tuning models these things can be fully automated.😎
Self review. Nobody does that.