hey you allπ
A couple week ago I've found Lightweight β‘ and simple π tools for testing my API. That's Thunder Client.
Thunder Client
...
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
Thunder Client does look cool, but just an FYI: it is not open source (which is of course also true of Postman). This matters around API testing tools as if (for example) you're hitting API endpoints which require auth, then any credentials you supply will go through that tool, so you have to trust that the authors/maintainers of that tool don't do anything questionable with those credentials. If the source is open, then you have the ability to examine the code to help alleviate this concern.
A similar extension is REST Client: marketplace.visualstudio.com/items... which is open source (github.com/Huachao/vscode-restclient).
Note that I'm not saying that Thunder Client is bad, or that REST Client is better, just that for my use cases REST Client is more aligned with my values (I personally don't use VS Code extensions unless they are open source), so sharing for others who would like similar options.
Thank you for sharing your insights on API testing tools! Your comment raises an important point about the significance of open-source software, especially when dealing with sensitive data like API credentials. It's commendable that you're considering the security implications of these tools.
While Thunder Client and Postman are indeed popular choices, it's great that you've highlighted REST Client as an open-source alternative. This information can be valuable for developers who prioritize transparency and code auditability in their toolset.
Speaking of API testing tools, I'd like to add another option to the mix: APIDog. This versatile tool offers a user-friendly interface for API development, testing, and documentation. Some key features of APIDog include:
APIDog strikes a balance between functionality and ease of use, making it suitable for both beginners and experienced developers. While it's always important to consider the open-source aspect, APIDog's robust security measures and regular updates make it a reliable choice for many teams.
Ultimately, the choice of API testing tool depends on individual needs and preferences. It's great to see developers like yourself encouraging thoughtful consideration of these factors. Keep up the excellent work in promoting informed decision-making in our developer community!
It has its flaws. When you use a Basic or Bearer token for authentication and change tabs, the token suddenly disappears. I'm sticking with Insomnia.
Hi Samuel, I am creator of Thunder Client. In Auth what ever tab is active it will take values from that tab, so if you want basic auth set the values leave that as active.
Let me know if you have any further questions.
If I may suggest, we should be able to save the requests as files and then each workspace could have its own set of collections
Hi Andre, the request is saved in json files. And you can also save collections per workspace, see Team Features on our GitHub page.
it seem has bug. you may give feedback and report it.
This looks BASICALLY the same as Insomnia (down to the UI), just in VSC?
I think so, in daily I use insomnia, now it has more clean UI
This is really cool, I used insomnia for a while now. This will make it one less step to take to quickly check a response during building or t-shooting. One feature that would be super sweet though is to have the ability to right click in an api sdk and make new request with it. Also swagger scraping would be pretty sweet too.
Anyways, thanks for the tip.
This is awesome. Iβll have to try it out. π
have nice trying
Nice post dude
thanks
Nice, but doesn't have postman's "export code" (php-curl for example)