Nice catch. It's funny because the plural method still worked for me - did it fail for you?
At any rate, newest version of the code should reference getContent.
getContent
Yeah it failed for me, I got a null error when it ran.
Does the code with getContent work for you now?
Yup. Thanks!
Great thanks for the back and forth and for reporting these errors.
Are you sure you want to hide this comment? It will become hidden in your post, but will still be visible via the comment's permalink.
Hide child comments as well
Confirm
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
We're a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.
Nice catch. It's funny because the plural method still worked for me - did it fail for you?
At any rate, newest version of the code should reference
getContent
.Yeah it failed for me, I got a null error when it ran.
Does the code with
getContent
work for you now?Yup. Thanks!
Great thanks for the back and forth and for reporting these errors.