Just another developer trying to get his tests fast, his features to add value and his bloody code to compile! Lately I've been enjoying writing about the best way to release software!
I really enjoyed reading this article but I can't help feeling that someone has beaten you with a broomstick far too many times... Then blamed it on OOP.
If you see code that looks like that, it doesn't matter what paradigm you claim to be following, you are doing it wrong!
I've been a professional C, Perl, PHP and Python developer.
I'm an ex-sysadmin from the late 20th century.
These days I do more Javascript and CSS and whatnot, and promote UX and accessibility.
I really enjoyed reading this article but I can't help feeling that someone has beaten you with a broomstick far too many times... Then blamed it on OOP.
If you see code that looks like that, it doesn't matter what paradigm you claim to be following, you are doing it wrong!
Thank you, and yes, youβre probably right. The problem is COMPLEXITY. But Iβd still argue that the solution is NOT OOP π
I'm joining this thread because the rest got flattened and is difficult to read.
I think that's a non-sequitur which doesn't do anything for your argument.
I'd say more like 4. You can see it's more verbose, you don't need to start counting braces to add to the argument!