I thought he was just doing a spectacular job of sparking good conversations.
That being said, using a type system isn’t always about the technical aspect. Often times there are emotional benefits: dev.to/cubiclebuddha/communicating...
A statically typed environment makes you less error prone. It enforces certain basic requirements and this is a mindset that you carry with you when moving to a dynamically typed language, which I personally found very helpful when I started getting more into JavaScript, coming from a Java and (PEP8) Python background.
I think it has made me more aware of the data flow in my code and better at designing the architecture of any system.
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
We're a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.
Less coding errors, code readability, easier debugging, aka quality of life!
I'm on @ben side here I don't fully see the point of types.
I don't have seen any bigger proof of these claims.
So can you maybe elaborate a little bit on your claims?
Thank you <3
Is @ben saying that he doesn’t like types?
I thought he was just doing a spectacular job of sparking good conversations.
That being said, using a type system isn’t always about the technical aspect. Often times there are emotional benefits:
dev.to/cubiclebuddha/communicating...
A statically typed environment makes you less error prone. It enforces certain basic requirements and this is a mindset that you carry with you when moving to a dynamically typed language, which I personally found very helpful when I started getting more into JavaScript, coming from a Java and (PEP8) Python background.
I think it has made me more aware of the data flow in my code and better at designing the architecture of any system.