Which One to Choose: Native Apps or Progressive Web Apps?

digitalprem1 profile image Digital Prem ・1 min read

Hybrid mobile applications are functionally around between native apps and web apps. As these two kinds of mobile software serve entirely different purposes, being poles apart, hybrid apps permeate the space between them and combine features of both sides. What makes them alike to native apps, is their sense to utilize native features of a mobile platform. Hybrid apps are disseminated through application stores and may use such native specialty as, for example, geolocation. On the other hand, it shares several useful features with web apps. It might be so that if you require building an application, a hybrid one would be the best solution for you.
Features of hybrid apps yielded with web apps:
• Built upon web technologies (JavaScript, HTML5, CSS3). That’s the principal distinction from native apps, which assume all the further features. The most traditional tools for formulating hybrid mobile software are Appcelerator Titanium and PhoneGap.
• Easier and quicker to develop than native apps. This results in cheaper development cost.
• Cross-platform capabilities. A prominent advantage, presented by web technologies – you may build the app once for several mobile platforms. But endure in mind, that an app may not run the equivalent on various devices, that is why cross-platform property software requires comprehensive testing on a roll of devices chosen by you. That’s how the viable problems are eliminated before deployment.
• Weaker performance than in native apps. That is why more complex apps will be affected by slightly lower speed and graphics. Suppose the balance of features and speed accurately – users are considered likely to switch to another app if they encounter delays. That’s why hybrid applications are not suitable for creating complex apps like games.
Features of hybrid apps, accorded with native apps:
• Division through application stores (such as Apple App Store, BlackBerry World, Google Play, and Windows Phone Store).
• Use of native device skills. That is an inaccessible alternative for mobile web apps. In case your software is working to depend on camera, geolocation, accelerometer, etc. – a hybrid applications will produce you with that.
• Offline capabilities. That’s a characteristic of the foremost importance for several apps. And that means much to users – having what they require and what they like anytime, anywhere.
The difference between Native and Hybrid apps
Native apps
use platform-specific language like Objective C or Java and interact with all native functionality of user’s mobile device and common UI elements. Native apps constantly remain connected with mobile GPS, stored files, camera, calendar, contacts, personal profiles and other in-built features, offering a seamless user experience and swift performance.
Hybrid apps
on the other hand resemble the functioning of web apps but have native qualities and web view experienced via device’s native browser. Moulded in native container, they are built from special frameworks that enable the smooth interactions between app’s interface and some of Smartphone’s native features and its hardware. For this to be possible, it requires cross-platform APIs. Any web developer skilled in HTML, CSS, JavaScript can ably create high-quality hybrid apps.There are lots of React Js development company , node js development company USA and Cordova App Development Company in USA. You can choose anyone.

  1. Low cost with ease of development: Due to unified development of hybrid mobile apps, businesses will not have to spend separately for building multiple versions of apps for multiple platforms. Instead, hybrid frameworks allow developers to build a single version, and write and maintain individual code bases for various platforms. This approach saves significant amount of money for small companies that want to save big and attract more revenue.
  2. Native experience with simple backend: Although native app delivers excellent user experience, a hybrid app does provide the most of what native UX offers along with keeping back-end structure simple.
  3. Creative ideas meet target audience: Ordinary web applications do not stay in touch with device’s OS and built-in environment. They are not as smart as today’s evolved apps and fail to emulate much polished native apps.
  4. High-speed performance: So far native apps have set mighty standard in terms of speed and performance. But when it comes to hybrid development, there is no question of speed either.
  5. Attractive UI/UX designs: Consistent experience and attractive design are two core elements that drive more users to your app.
  6. Offline Support: Offline support of any hybrid app could be one of the most rewarding features for people who:

o Have limited data consumption plans

o Live in rural or underdeveloped neighborhood

o Have connections that often get interrupted

• Are always on the go
Pure web applications could be beneficial to only those individuals who reside in urban areas where high-speed internet access is seamless.

o Offline support keeps the users connected to some of their apps features even when they lose network connection

o Consumers living in a fast-paced environment immensely depend on mobile apps that limit number of attempts their apps take to reconnect

• In hybrid apps, due to device’s API, users can store certain data locally as offline storage, which is useful to those in transit or who frequently lose coverage

  1. Hassle-free integration with other apps: As native apps run only on the same OS, it is challenging for users to make it integrate or work in harmony with other apps.
  2. Multi-platform support: Usually, hybrid applications have no limit to how much it can expand and support almost all platforms if they are popular.
  3. Qualified for online marketplace: Google Play and Apple store follow strict guidelines for the kind of app that can be published in there.

Posted on by:


Editor guide