DEV Community

Nucu Labs
Nucu Labs

Posted on

Practical Binary Analysis – CTF Walkthrough – Level 3, 4

Hello,

In this article I'll present you my solution on the Chapter 5 CTF from the book Practical Binary Analysis.

For this binary, the hint is to fix four broken things.

Running file gives us the following response:

binary@binary-VirtualBox:~/ctf$ file ./lvl3 
./lvl3: ERROR: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, Motorola Coldfire, version 1 (Novell Modesto) error reading (Invalid argument)
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

And the readelf command gives us:

binary@binary-VirtualBox:~/ctf$ readelf -h ./lvl3 
ELF Header:
  Magic:   7f 45 4c 46 02 01 01 0b 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 
  Class:                             ELF64
  Data:                              2's complement, little endian
  Version:                           1 (current)
  OS/ABI:                            Novell - Modesto
  ABI Version:                       0
  Type:                              EXEC (Executable file)
  Machine:                           Motorola Coldfire
  Version:                           0x1
  Entry point address:               0x4005d0
  Start of program headers:          4022250974 (bytes into file)
  Start of section headers:          4480 (bytes into file)
  Flags:                             0x0
  Size of this header:               64 (bytes)
  Size of program headers:           56 (bytes)
  Number of program headers:         9
  Size of section headers:           64 (bytes)
  Number of section headers:         29
  Section header string table index: 28
readelf: Error: Reading 0x1f8 bytes extends past end of file for program headers
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

At this moment, it was clear that the ELF header is broken, in order to fix it I opened up Wikipedia and the elf specification.

As I went through each field manually, with Binary Ninj. As I was checking the offset of the current byte, at 0x07, Wikipedia says: It is often set to 0 regardless of the target platform. I've changed it to 0x00. (Note: I think this field was probably ok as it is)

At offset 0x12, the value Specifies target instruction set architecture and is currently invalid. From googling, I found an article titled: Novell's Next Generation OS Will Natively Support Intel's Future IA-64 Architecture so I set the value to 0x3E.

binjahex.jpg

At offset 0x20 we have the e_phoff which Points to the start of the program header table. It usually follows the file header immediately, making the offset 0x34 or 0x40 for 32- and 64-bit ELF executables, respectively. The value de ad be ef is clearly invalid. I replaced the value with 40 00 00 00.

At this moment I thought I fixed the binary and ran it, it ran and it gave me an invalid flag.

If you run the following command:

binary@binary-VirtualBox:/media/sf_Dropzone$ readelf -S ./lvl3 | grep .text
  [14] .text             NOBITS           0000000000400550  00000550
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

You'll see that the .text section is marked as 0x8 - NOBITS and it should be 0x1 - PROGBITS. To make the change I've used Binary Ninja as a hex editor, opening the binary in raw mode.

From the readelf command:

  Start of section headers:          4480 (bytes into file)
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

The start of the section header is 4480 bytes. A section header has the length of 0x40 bytes. 4480 to hex -> 0x1180. 0x40 * 14 + 0x1180 = 0x1500.

At offset 0x1504 we change the type from SHT_NOBITS to SHT_PROGBITS.

After we run the binary we get the valid flag:

3a5c381e40d2fffd95ba4452a0fb4a40  ./lvl3
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

After finishing level 3 I wanted to go to sleep and before going I thought of running ltrace, strace on the binary and I got this:

binary@binary-VirtualBox:~/ctf$ ltrace ./lvl4
__libc_start_main(0x4004a0, 1, 0x7ffd6fb460e8, 0x400650 <unfinished ...>
setenv("FLAG", "656cf8aecb76113a4dece1688c61d0e7"..., 1)             = 0
+++ exited (status 0) +++
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Didn't expect this, very nice tho.

Thanks for reading!

Top comments (0)