DEV Community

Cover image for Web Component developers do not connect with the connectedCallback (yet)
Danny Engelman
Danny Engelman

Posted on • Edited on

Web Component developers do not connect with the connectedCallback (yet)

#webcomponents #javascript #webdev #dom

Disclaimer: This blog post suggests using setTimeout

This post was originally written as StackOverflow answer in February 2022:
WTF? this.innerHTML is an empty string in the connectedCallback

Ping back: https://dbushell.com/2024/06/15/custom-elements-unconnected-callback/

When was DOM parsed?

Key is to understand when DOM was parsed

In the script below, everyone will agree the result tab will show:
because the first script executed before the remaining DOM was parsed.

the connectedCallback fires on the opening tag!

Then how do you think the DOM Parser handles this code?

  • component-1 is defined before DOM is parsed

  • component-2 is defined after DOM is parsed

Read the code below, then click the Result Tab

If you understand why the answer is:

You can stop reading here.

component-1 connectedCallback()

Because the connectedCallback fires on the opening tag! all following DOM (DIVs in lightDOM) is NOT parsed yet

That means all component-1 attributes (id in above code) are available ON the Web Component,

But NOT its three <div> child elements IN lightDOM.

Wait till lightDOM is parsed

Simplest method to get that lightDOM content is to delay execution till the Event Loop is empty again, and you know more (and most likely all) of your lightDOM was parsed.

With a setTimeout

Optional background knowledge:

Youtube: Jake Archibald on the web browser event loop, setTimeout, requestAnimationFrame

component-1 setTimeout executes after DOM is parsed (the DIVs in lightDOM)

Also note (in the above Results Tab) that component-1 wrote its output after component-2, because of the setTimeout in component-1

BUT!

Because the Event Loop can be(come) empty when the (large) DOM is still being parsed!

This gets you the next N elements parsed,

not ALL elements in a large lightDOM!

Rough tests show around N=1000 (1000 lightDOM elements) are safe to work with.

but your mileage may vary for complex CPU consuming elements

Maybe just increase to 10 milliseconds setTimeout delay

Sidenote: Should a Web Component with a 1000 Childnodes really be one Web Component?

requestAnimationFrame (rAF)

requestAnimationFrame can also be used. Read!:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/71523029/settimeout-vs-requestanimationframe

rAF fires before or after setTimeout. I my tests setTimeout already could access that lightDOM

Do watch Jakes video before using rAF!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cCOL7MC4Pl0

Potential pitfall: the attributeChangedCallback

!!! The attributedChangedCallback fires BEFORE the connectedCallback for every attribute defined as an observed attribute in static get observedAttributes() which is declared as initial attribute on your Custom Element.

If none of those Observed attributes exist on the Element in the DOM, attributeChangedCallback will not execute.

setTimeout gets you the next N elements

N can be scary for a developer only used to digital 0 and 1 states

If you can't deal with N

get ALL children - parsedCallback()

For getting all Child nodes, there is parsedCallback() by WebReflection.

But LOC (Lines Of Code) now goes from 1 to 77 :

https://github.com/WebReflection/html-parsed-element/blob/master/index.js

Maybe good to add this to your own BaseClass.
But for small components you are adding more overhead than a setTimeout or rAF takes.

Lifecycle methods in Lit, Stencil, FAST, Hybirds and 61 other tools

Almost all Tools add their own parsedCallback like lifecycle methods:

Saving unexperienced developers headaches

Biggest drawback; you learn a Tool, not the Technology.

And your code now executes (way) later than that setTimeout, so more (potential) FOUCs and Layout Shifts to deal with.

What the experts said

Experts discussion has been going on since 2016

That is nearly a decade now

The issue is obviously not that big it needs a solution

Not that everyone is aware of the issue...

Old Mozilla/FireFox bug

Closed bug report: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1673811

Up until Spring 2021 there where issues with connectedCallback in FireFox always firing late, so all above mentioned issues never happened in FireFox... but do now.

Escaping all issues

9 out 10 devs will not understand why they fixed the "bug"

When Web Components are defined AFTER DOM was created you don't have any of these connectedCallback issues; because all DOM was parsed

So a <script defer src="yourelement.js"> does the job; but will run after all DOM is created,

your components are now created (very) late. So you now have to deal with (more) FOUCs.

This also applies to <script type="module"> and other ways of importing modules.

Your script will most likely be executed after DOM was parsed.

Best advice is to just make your Web Components work for the before scenario.

Online IDEs

CodePen, JSFiddle and all those online IDEs run the JavaScript AFTER the DOM is created!

So you never experience any issues there.

Test your code outside of these online IDEs before you take it to production!

Conclusion

All together now!

the connectedCallback fires on the opening tag!

I use setTimeout in Web Components where I really need that lightDOM

Never had an issue, since I started with Web Components in 2017

There are plenty of other workarounds using readystatechange, MutationObserver, Promisses possible.
Use whatever you think suits you best. It is all about DOM having been parsed or not.


Took me 3 hours to format this blog-post. No need to buy me coffee, or send me money. I am happy enough if you just send some positive karma into this f*ing world.




Top comments (12)

Collapse
 
alaindet profile image
Alain D'Ettorre • • Edited

So, the best thing to do is just putting all the JavaScript code on the bottom of the body tag, as always, let the browser create a myriad of UnknownHTMLElement instances, the let it upgrade all instances when customElement.define() triggers. That opens the door to inability to interact and FOUC (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flash_of_uns...) for me, and yet it seems to be the best approach.

When I first started to learn about web components, I already knew Angular so I thought "ok connectedCallback() is like ngOnInit()" and actually it is, because if you need to read the parsed children you need to call ngAfterViewInit() and ngAfterContentInit() which are Angular-specific methods to interact with inner HTML, not ngOnInit(). Still, connectedCallback() seemed to be used by other developers more like "run this when the DOM is ready to be queried" more than "run this when the component is attached to the DOM, but maybe it's not ready yet". I guess it's just a little confusing all around and frameworks do a much better job than "standards" in giving simple flows and guarantees for me.

React is different, because a useEffect() without dependencies actually triggers after any first render (I'd say almost like a setTimeout()) and it actually works as intended.

Collapse
 
darkwiiplayer profile image
𒎏Wii 🏳️‍⚧️ • • Edited

Wouldn't a much simpler "readystatechange" event listener get you like 98% of the way there?

Like, I imagine something like (untested):

connectedCallback() {
   if (document.readyState === "loading") {
      return document.addEventListener("readystatechange", event => this.connectedCallback())
   }

   console.log("Initialising component:", this)
}
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Edit: As I am working on a custom element right now, I decided to try this, and noticed two things:

  • Wrapping the method in a function seems to not be necessary
  • The event listener should be set to run only once 
connectedCallback() {
   if (document.readyState === "loading") {
      return document.addEventListener("readystatechange", this.connectedCallback, {once: true})
   }

   console.log("Initialising component:", this)
}
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

EDIT: Added a console.log to both examples to make it clearer where the actual initialisation code goes.

Collapse
 
Sloan, the sloth mascot
Comment deleted
Collapse
 
darkwiiplayer profile image
𒎏Wii 🏳️‍⚧️ •

Depends how you do it, I guess?

I assume you're mostly considering using innerHTML here, which I tend to stay away from whenever possible, so to me that falls in the remaining 2%.

Building a custom element in JS (including children) and then inserting it into the page will run the callback on a populated component. If you want to add elements afterwards, then you probably need a MutationObserver anyway, because you'll likely want to continue monitoring for changes for the entirety of the components life-cycle, not just for some initial "setup" phase where you continue adding children manually.

Thread Thread
 
dannyengelman profile image
Danny Engelman •

It has nothing to do with innerHTML It doesn't matter how you add DOM to your existing page, readystatechange will never fire again after the first pageload.

Thread Thread
 
darkwiiplayer profile image
𒎏Wii 🏳️‍⚧️ •

I don't think I understand what requirements you have towards your custom elements then.

I see two settings:

a) A custom element should consider its child elements when it is created and do some stuff with those, but can afterwards become inert because the contents of the element are static at that point.

b) The component should respond to insertions and deletions throughout its entire lifetime and update its internal state accordingly on every change.

In the first case, the site load is the only problematic part, because the element gets inserted into the DOM before its children have been parsed. When creating the element from javascript, the child elements are already there by the time the element is connected, so the connectedCallback will work just fine.

In the latter case, inserting items initially is really just a not-so-special case of inserting items at any point during the object's lifecycle, so no special code is required here.

The dynamic case can usually be achieved relatively easily with a generic MutationObserver that dispatches an event or calls a method on its target.

Thread Thread
 
dannyengelman profile image
Danny Engelman • • Edited

There is no requirement, there is a fact.

This blog is (an attempt) to explain why there is no innerHTML when the Web Component is defined before the DOM is parsed

Almost all Web Components posted on X in the last month, fall into this trap.. and don't work in 100% of cases.

<script>
  customElements.define("my-component", class extends HTMLElement {
    connectedCallback() {
        console.log(this.innerHTML); // empty string!
    }
  });
</script>

<my-component>Hello World</my-component>
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Yes, you can solve part of the issue with a MutationObserver; that is like taking a sledgehammer to drive in a nail.

Thread Thread
 
darkwiiplayer profile image
𒎏Wii 🏳️‍⚧️ • • Edited

I think this conversation is going in circles.

To reiterate:

  • A simple readystatechange event listener can fix the problem where custom elements appear in the HTML sent from the server
  • If you insert them using JavaScript, you can populate them before insertion
  • If you need to insert elements after connecting to the DOM, you need the sledge hammer

Most of your post makes perfect sense, but towards the end you start to consider a weird case that I don't exactly get where you insert a custom element from client-side code, but you talk about it like DOM parsing is still a factor here, which I don't understand how that would be the case.

Going back to the code in my original comment:

connectedCallback() {
   if (document.readyState === "loading") {
      return document.addEventListener("readystatechange", this.connectedCallback, {once: true})
   }
}
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

and the example you provided

const body = document.body;
body.addEventListener("click", (evt) => {
   body.append( document.createElement("my-cool-component") );
}
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Maybe you could explain what would have to happen for this to fail? There's no child-elements being added to the component in your example, so I don't see where the problem is supposed to come from.

Thread Thread
 
dannyengelman profile image
Danny Engelman • • Edited

Yes, that is a a wrong answer in my comment, I re-read the blog post; looks fine to me.

I added a better reply to your readystatechange .

Full working (and readystatechange failing) JSFiddle is: jsfiddle.net/WebComponents/d9sbzcex/

Note: As I said in the blog, WebReflection wrote a parsedCallback that fires when all child Nodes are available.
github.com/WebReflection/html-pars...
It uses the document readyState, MutationObserver and lost more MJ... and is 77 lines of code

The one liner setTimeout will get you the next N Child Nodes

N can be scary for developers who only believe in digital 0 and 1 values, and can't deal with quarks or Schrodingers cat when programming.

Collapse
 
dannyengelman profile image
Danny Engelman • • Edited

readystatechage will not work

Here is a full working JSFiddle: jsfiddle.net/WebComponents/d9sbzcex/

Extract of your solution:

    customElements.define("your-component", class extends BaseClass {
        connectedCallback() {
            LOG("Init", this); // Empty innerHTML
            if (document.readyState == "loading") {
                document.addEventListener("readystatechange", () => {
                    LOG("Access", this); // Hello World!
                }, {
                    once: true
                })
            }
        }
    });
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Issues

  • (minor) You can not call this.connectedCallback in the handler, it will have the wrong lexical scope. so a .bind(this) is required

  • But you can't just run connectedCallback again because it would run any other (initialization) code again also So I changed your code as above

Code now runs fine

Although your workaround runs "late" after the readystatechange Event

But now another issue occurs

Because your code relies on an Event that happens only once, that code will never fire again.

So if you move DOM around, or append DOM, that Event will never fire.

Your component never did the "Access" again

Collapse
 
darkwiiplayer profile image
𒎏Wii 🏳️‍⚧️ •

That isn't my work-around though. Here's what that should look like:

customElements.define("your-component", class extends BaseClass {
    connectedCallback() {
        if (document.readyState === "loading") {
            return document.addEventListener("readystatechange", this.connectedCallback.bind(this), {once: true})
        }
        LOG("Access", this); // Hello World!
    }
});
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

When the component is loaded before the DOM is fully loaded, it will defer its connectedCallback to the next readystatechange event by attaching an event listener and returning early, but when the DOM has already loaded, it will jump over the early return and do its initialisation as usual.

This works in all three cases:

  • When the component is defined before the DOM finishes loading (via the event handler)
  • When the component is defined after the DOM finishes loading (skipping the early return)
  • When the component is inserted via javascript (again, skipping the early return)
Collapse
 
ccardea profile image
Christopher Cardea • • Edited

I've spent a lot of time over the past few days researching the problem of how to access the children of a shadow root in a custom element, including the discussions linked in the post and the HTML standard. This blog post is the only thing that pointed me toward a solution, so thank you for that. I tried the readystatechange approach but it didn't work in my application. Even when readystate was complete, the children still were not available. I was reluctant to use setTimeout(), because there's no way to know how long the timeout needs to be. I chose setInterval() instead, like so

async childrenReady(){
        return new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
            const intervalId = setInterval(() => {
                if (this.shadowRoot.children.length > 0) {
                    clearInterval(intervalId);
                    resolve(true);
                }
            }, 2);
        });
    }
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode
View full discussion (12 comments)

Read next

algoorgoal profile image

[ state, setState ] instead of { state, setState }

Chan -

anthonymax profile image

🔥HMPL — best alternative to HTMX

Anthony Max -

chintanonweb profile image

Mastering JavaScript Memory: A Beginner’s Guide to Stack and Heap

chintanonweb -

keploy profile image

Understanding HTTP Status Codes: A Complete Guide

keploy -