Photo by Christopher Gower on Unsplash
Silicon Valley Season 2 ruined it for me. Richard had worked so hard on Pied Piper, but Gavin is almost able to steal it from him. Why? Cause Richard pulled down the code he had written on his work device and ran the test suite. How could something so trivial almost cost him so much! That season embedded itself in me, and now I try to keep my personal and professional software as separate as can be. And one thing this requires is having a personal machine, on top of the computer provided by my employer.
As anyone who's done development on different machines can speak to, I found it frustrating at first when settings from one device didn't transfer to the other. For a while, I used Google Drive to manage settings for a few different apps, including the text editor I used at the time. But eventually, I started doing more things in my terminal, and I wanted to keep a copy of the configuration files for all my terminal programs and tools, somewhere that I could share between machines. I did what seemed to me to be the norm and created a
dotfiles repo on Github. And used some tool to symlink or copy between the actual 'live' files in my home directory
~, and the repo files living in their project directory, something like
~/Projects/dotfiles. I did this for years and thought of it as a solved problem. That isn't to say this setup didn't have issues. I would often experiment with something and edit the 'live' configuration files for a quicker feedback loop and forget to update the 'project' files. Or once I switched to symlinks, I would add a new file to a directory 'live', and it would never end up in the
git repo at all. I had half-solutions to both of these issues, though, and I was happy.
One day, I talked to a co-worker, and they told me something that would change my dotfiles forever.
You can make your home directory a git repo
This thought immediately struck me. Why should I keep a separate directory with a copy of these files or deal with symlinking across the directories? It made so much sense! With a single set of files, I would eliminate a whole suite of small annoyances I had with my dotfiles.
However, I was worried about this kind of setup. I have my projects nested under my home directory, so would that break things? Was I going to commit these projects in my dotfiles? Was I finally going to learn what git sub-modules were?
Luckily my co-worker also gave me the magic sauce to make this happen, and I've adopted it in my dotfiles ever since! The 'trick' is to change your
.gitignore file to an 'allow list' instead of a 'block list'. The syntax of
.gitignore makes this pretty easy!
.gitignore file is processed from top to bottom, so to start this trick, we add
* as the first line in our
git is actually going to ignore every file. We can go back in, and one by one, allow different files and directories with the
! prefix operator! For example, a very minimalistic
.gitignore for a dotfiles repo like this might be like the following.
With this setup, you can easily share your
bash_profile between machines in your dotfiles repo and be confident this is the only file shared. Only the things you explicitly allow in the
.gitignore file will be included in the repo! I find this works really well for a dotfiles repo, as I have many more files in my home directory that I want git to ignore, it would be tedious and error-prone to try to block each of them individually.
Luckily having 'nested' git repo's like this doesn't really affect the 'inner' repos at all. By that, I mean that my project repos are none the wiser to my dotfiles setup, and no special config is needed for them. Git tools simply look upwards for the closest
.git directory, so having one farther up the directory tree isn't an issue.
The one caveat to be aware of if you dive in with me and take this approach is that you are almost always in a git repo. Even if you are simply in a git ignored directory. Does this matter? In practice, I find it really doesn't a ton. My
bash_prompt always shows me I'm in a git repo, but nothing else is really affected.
I've been doing my dotfiles like this for a while, and I can't imagine going back! Maybe give it a shot and let me know what you think.
If you want a more detailed explanation of how to set this up, keep reading with me, and we'll walk through it together.
The actual how of doing it is slightly more complicated but only as a one-time setup. Let's walk through how you might set up a new dotfiles repo directly in your home directory and share it across multiple machines!
Creating a repo on your first machine
So to start out, let's assume you have some files in your home directory that you want to put in your dotfiles repo.
Warning: If your dotfiles are symlinks to the 'real' files elsewhere, you will want to replace those symlinks with actual copies of the files before we get started. If you follow these steps with symlinks, git will only pick up the symlink destination and not the actual file contents.
Ok, let's get started! I'm gonna hop into a VM so that we can start fresh together.
I have three files I want to share between machines:
.bash_prompt for all my 100% necessary bash customizations. And then
.gnupg/gpg-agent.conf, which contains some setup that I needed to make my Yubikey work. But even in a brand new VM, my home directory is full of way more than that.
$ pwd /home/coreyja $ ls -a . Downloads .sudo_as_admin_successful .. .gnupg Templates .bash_history gpg.pub .vboxclient-clipboard.pid .bash_logout .local .vboxclient-display-svga-x11.pid .bash_prompt Music .vboxclient-draganddrop.pid .cache Pictures .vboxclient-hostversion.pid .config .profile .vboxclient-seamless.pid Desktop Public Videos Documents .ssh
First, we need to create a new git repo. We can just run
git init .
$ git init . Initialized empty Git repository in /home/coreyja/.git/
As an optional step, we will also switch to a
main branch that we will use here as the default branch.
$ git checkout -b main Switched to a new branch 'main'
Tip: If you have
git version 2.28.0 or newer, you can do this from your git init with the
--initial-branch flag. Ex:
git init . --initial-branch=main
Right now, we have an empty git repo, but it 'wants' to track everything in my home directory. Nothing is tracked because we haven't
git added anything, but the entire home directory is coming up as untracked.
$ git status On branch main No commits yet Untracked files: (use "git add <file>..." to include in what will be committed) .bash_history .bash_logout .bash_prompt .cache/ .config/ .gnupg/ .local/ .profile .ssh/ .sudo_as_admin_successful .vboxclient-clipboard.pid .vboxclient-display-svga-x11.pid .vboxclient-draganddrop.pid .vboxclient-seamless.pid gpg.pub nothing added to commit but untracked files present (use "git add" to track)
Now, let's add a
.gitignore file that ignores everything.
$ echo '*' > .gitignore $ git status On branch main No commits yet nothing to commit (create/copy files and use "git add" to track)
git status shows that there is nothing to commit because we ignored everything. But we actually DO want to track the
.gitignore file we made. That is because
.gitignore basically becomes the 'manifest' of files to commit to the repo, and as such, does need to be present on each machine. So let's add to our
.gitignore file to tell it we DO want to track the
.gitignore file itself, how meta.
$ echo '!.gitignore' >> .gitignore $ git status On branch main No commits yet Untracked files: (use "git add <file>..." to include in what will be committed) .gitignore nothing added to commit but untracked files present (use "git add" to track)
The syntax used was to put a
! before the file name, which acts like a NOT ignore; tracking the file!
Now that git shows some untracked changes, we can add the
.gitignore file and commit.
$ git add --all $ git commit -m "The bare bones of our dotfiles setup. Currently just a gitignore file that ignores everything besides itself" [main (root-commit) 664ab8d] The bare bones of our dotfiles setup. Currently just a gitignore file that ignores everything besides itself 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) create mode 100644 .gitignore
And from here, we can just repeat what we did for
.gitignore and add the rest of the files we want to track! Lets start with the
$ echo '!.bash_profile' >> .gitignore $ echo '!.bash_prompt' >> .gitignore $ git status On branch main Changes not staged for commit: (use "git add <file>..." to update what will be committed) (use "git restore <file>..." to discard changes in working directory) modified: .gitignore Untracked files: (use "git add <file>..." to include in what will be committed) .bash_profile .bash_prompt no changes added to commit (use "git add" and/or "git commit -a") $ git add --all $ git commit -m "Track the bash_profile and bash_prompt files" [main fdd42e4] Track the bash_profile and bash_prompt files 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+) create mode 100644 .bash_profile create mode 100644 .bash_prompt
Now let's do the for the
$ echo '!.gnupg/gpg-agent.conf' >> .gitignore $ git status On branch main Changes not staged for commit: (use "git add <file>..." to update what will be committed) (use "git restore <file>..." to discard changes in working directory) modified: .gitignore no changes added to commit (use "git add" and/or "git commit -a")
Hmm, that didn't work quite as well... That's due to how gitignore works on directories. You need to allow BOTH the directory and the file. For things in sub-directories, you need the 'allow' each directory and the final file. Once we ignore the directory, we can go ahead and commit the
$ echo '!.gnupg/' >> .gitignore $ git status On branch main Changes not staged for commit: (use "git add <file>..." to update what will be committed) (use "git restore <file>..." to discard changes in working directory) modified: .gitignore Untracked files: (use "git add <file>..." to include in what will be committed) .gnupg/ no changes added to commit (use "git add" and/or "git commit -a") $ git add -all $ git status On branch main Changes to be committed: (use "git restore --staged <file>..." to unstage) modified: .gitignore new file: .gnupg/gpg-agent.conf $ git commit -m "Add the gpg-agent file as well" [main e228187] Add the gpg-agent file as well 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+) create mode 100644 .gnupg/gpg-agent.conf
After all this, here is my
.gitignore file (eagle-eyed readers will notice I reordered this, so the
.gnupg/ directory comes before the filename, this is optional, but I like how it looks better personally).
$ cat .gitignore * !.gitignore !.bash_profile !.bash_prompt !.gnupg/ !.gnupg/gpg-agent.conf
Now we can push this up to your Git host of choice; I'll use Github here to demo.
$ git remote add origin firstname.lastname@example.org:coreyja/example-dotfiles.git $ git push --set-upstream origin main Enumerating objects: 13, done. Counting objects: 100% (13/13), done. Compressing objects: 100% (6/6), done. Writing objects: 100% (13/13), 1.07 KiB | 1.07 MiB/s, done. Total 13 (delta 1), reused 0 (delta 0) remote: Resolving deltas: 100% (1/1), done. To github.com:coreyja/example-dotfiles.git * [new branch] main -> main Branch 'main' set up to track remote branch 'main' from 'origin'.
And there we go! You can expand on this to add any files you want in your dotfiles repo! You can edit the 'live' files in place and easily commit the results. You don't have to worry about accidentally leaking anything from your home directory since you have to manually allow files and directories.
Cloning this repo on your second machine
Ok, so now let's move to machine two, and copy these dotfiles down. For this demo, let's also look at what happens when there is a conflict and your second machine's version doesn't match the version we had on our original machine.
On this machine, we have a slightly different bash prompt.
Machine2$ cat .bash_prompt export PS1="Machine2$ "
If we try to clone the repo we created, we will get an error since we don't have an empty directory.
Machine2$ git clone email@example.com:coreyja/example-dotfiles.git . fatal: destination path '.' already exists and is not an empty directory.
So what we need to do is create an empty git repo, and then wire up the origin and do a fetch.
Machine2$ git init Initialized empty Git repository in /home/coreyja/.git/ Machine2$ git remote add origin firstname.lastname@example.org:coreyja/example-dotfiles.git Machine2$ git fetch remote: Enumerating objects: 13, done. remote: Counting objects: 100% (13/13), done. remote: Compressing objects: 100% (5/5), done. remote: Total 13 (delta 1), reused 13 (delta 1), pack-reused 0 Unpacking objects: 100% (13/13), 1.05 KiB | 540.00 KiB/s, done. From github.com:coreyja/example-dotfiles * [new branch] main -> origin/main
So now we have our remote all set up, let's set up a local branch.
Machine2$ git checkout -b main Switched to a new branch 'main' Machine2$ git reset --mixed origin/main Unstaged changes after reset: M .bash_prompt D .gitignore
Here we used
git reset to tell git that our
HEAD is the same as the origin version, or we want to operate as if we were 'on' that commit. We use
--mixed so that it keeps our local changes. We can then see if any of our local changes are things we want to keep or remove.
You might also notice it says we 'deleted' the
.gitignore file. This is because this machine didn't have a
.gitignore. We want to take this file from the version we already committed on the first machine. If we don't and run
git status, you will see we aren't yet ignoring the rest of the home directory. So let us go ahead and checkout the origin copy.
Machine2$ git checkout origin/main -- .gitignore Machine2$ git status On branch main Changes not staged for commit: (use "git add <file>..." to update what will be committed) (use "git restore <file>..." to discard changes in working directory) modified: .bash_prompt no changes added to commit (use "git add" and/or "git commit -a")
Now we can take a look at the diff between our local version and the origin.
Machine2$ git diff diff --git a/.bash_prompt b/.bash_prompt index 6d41176..fdbe383 100644 --- a/.bash_prompt +++ b/.bash_prompt @@ -1 +1 @@ -export PS1="$ " +export PS1="Machine2$ "
In this case, I think I want to throw away both versions and create a new prompt to use on both machines!
Machine2$ echo 'export PS1="coreyja $ "' > .bash_prompt Machine2$ source .bash_prompt coreyja $ git add -all coreyja $ git commit -m "Get second machine setup and create a more unified prompt" [main 9449185] Get second machine setup and create a more unified prompt 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) coreyja $ git push --set-upstream origin main Enumerating objects: 5, done. Counting objects: 100% (5/5), done. Compressing objects: 100% (2/2), done. Writing objects: 100% (3/3), 311 bytes | 311.00 KiB/s, done. Total 3 (delta 1), reused 0 (delta 0) remote: Resolving deltas: 100% (1/1), completed with 1 local object. To github.com:coreyja/example-dotfiles.git e228187..9449185 main -> main Branch 'main' set up to track remote branch 'main' from 'origin'.
While we were doing those last steps, we used
git add --all. When I've talked to people about this workflow before, they get worried that commands like this will accidentally commit more than they want. But as you can see, that isn't the case!
git add follows the
.gitignore file, so it will only add the files we explicitly allow.
And there you have it! Now we have a dotfiles repo setup on two machines, but even better, the repo lives directly in your home directory! No more copying or symlinking! Simply edit the files and create a commit, nice and simple and using all the tools you already know and love!
I hope more people give this technique a try and let me know what you think!
Top comments (10)
A far more elegant solution - simpler, not needing maintaining .gitignore, and not making my home dir a git repo - can be found here: atlassian.com/git/tutorials/dotfiles
Only microscopic drawback is that I have a separate alias for git. I call my alias cfg, which also makes it very explicit that I'm doing config file stuff.
I've been using it for years without any hassles at all, and can't recommend it enough.
Thank's @coreyja , inspired me to start centralising my dotfiles.
And thanks for that link Rune, interesting alternative. Just to add that there's also a dev.to article based on the Atlassian approach from @skelebrina here: dev.to/skelebrina/dotfile-manageme...
Thank you for the mention Jon!
Glad it inspired ya @jonlauridsen !
Thanks for the other link too, will check it out!
Indeed, it took me a while to figure what a bare repo is, so I explained it visually here: marcel.is/managing-dotfiles-with-g...
Oh ya that is another good way to do it! I'll have to dig more into that sometime and compare the techniques. Thanks for sharing!
I thought about this approach but ended up going for a script that would symlink my dotfiles. Another approach that works similar to this would be using
git bare. I have a short example at the bottom of the
READMEin my dotfiles.
Oh interesting I hadn't heard of the
git --baremethod! I'll have to check that out, thanks for sharing!
I've been symlinking my dotfiles but this seems like a way better approach.
Ya give it a try and let me know what you think! It really simplified my workflow.
I'd love to hear how you like it if you end up trying it out!