I don't think you are just simulating OOP here. Very nice demonstration that OOP doesn't necessarily require a language that was designed for OOP (although it helps).
Indeed, after all it's all about abstractions. We developers only see abstractions.
At some point, even in a language designed to support OOP, under the hood the implementation is somehow similar to what I demonstrated here.
Exactly.
Are you sure you want to hide this comment? It will become hidden in your post, but will still be visible via the comment's permalink.
Hide child comments as well
Confirm
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
We're a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.
I don't think you are just simulating OOP here. Very nice demonstration that OOP doesn't necessarily require a language that was designed for OOP (although it helps).
Indeed, after all it's all about abstractions. We developers only see abstractions.
At some point, even in a language designed to support OOP, under the hood the implementation is somehow similar to what I demonstrated here.
Exactly.