DEV Community

Cover image for Last night my side project made one person happy, and someone else pissed off

Last night my side project made one person happy, and someone else pissed off

Chris Dermody on February 18, 2019

I've been working on a side project, mydevportfol.io for about 2 years now (on and off). It's finally at a point where it's good enough that people...
Collapse
 
sliqjustin profile image
sliq-justin

In fairness to "a disgruntled user", there is no mention anywhere of the price or the fact that it is a paid service. There are a few other things, in fact, that could lead someone to conclude that it is a free service you are providing:

  • The "How it works" section omits the payment step.
  • "It's in active development" implies a project, not a finished product.

To be clear, I don't think there's anything wrong with any of what I pointed out above, and I think that getting your first paying customer is kind of a big deal and worth celebrating. But if you want to avoid getting emails from people who think you're wasting their time, and you also want to "make sure that [y]our work is valued", maybe make it clear?

Collapse
 
chipd profile image
Chris Dermody

Those are damn good points actually - thank you for pointing them out. I've been neglecting the homepage for so long, just been concentrating on features and bug fixes.

Will make some ninja edits to that page now and push an update, thanks!

Collapse
 
itr13 profile image
Mikael Klages

Though I think it's good to take paid for your work, the way you don't mention payment at all until the very end is kinda despicable, since you're taking taking advantage of humans' bias towards the sunk cost fallacy.

Though nobody should be offended for a service like this not being free simply because they themselves are unwilling to pay for it, I'd say they're in the right here due to

A: the inability to inform themself about whether or not the service is a paid servuce before using it, and

B: most sites on the internet being free unless explicitly stated, thus it not being unreasonable to assume your site is free too (due to lack of visible prices)

Collapse
 
chipd profile image
Chris Dermody

Yup, I goofed, the user should be aware that it's a paid service up front. As I mentioned in another comment I've been neglecting the homepage for quite a while now, gonna make some tweaks to it now, I definitely don't want to be misleading anyone, and it wasn't an intentional thing to take advantage of anyone's perception of sunk cost.

Cheers!

Collapse
 
itr13 profile image
Mikael Klages • Edited

Yeah, kudos to you for making a post on dev.to asking for people's thoughts, most people would probably just think the user was complaining about paid services and leave it at that ^^

Collapse
 
anwar_nairi profile image
Anwar

I am splitted between, rewarding the good work, and contributing to the open source ecosystem outside your daily job.

In one hand, all your efforts should be rewarded, because this is mostly time you took over family weekend or working out or taking care of you, and for the service offered.

On the other hand I guess if you make the month with your primary job, you might have used open source tools in your business project, and so giving back is not a bad thing too.

I am more of the second group, I used so many great packages that made my job easier, and giving back is so great at the end of the day. And for me personally, if this stay side project, I know I could never bring this business proof quality to my projects so I would never dare to make people pay for my side projects.

I guess if the offer is fair (like a freemium) it is OK to make people reward you for the good service.