What are your dos and don'ts for an effective resumé?
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
Read next
Tabs Component with RiotJS (Material Design)
Steeve -
Compared Effect Of Image Captioning For SDXL Fine-tuning / DreamBooth Training for a Single Person, 10.3 GB VRAM via OneTrainer
Furkan Gözükara -
How Do You Define "Meaningful Work?"
dev.to staff -
Learn Generative AI for Free [E-Book]!
Pavan Belagatti -
Oldest comments (60)
Create some information architecture for skills you might have. If you're applying for a dev job, and you want to point out other software skills, like photoshop — don't mash it together with your python skills.
If your skills section is too "flat" someone might read into it as "oh, this person is way too much of a generalist", are they specifically skilled as a python developer?
You can have those other skills, but just make sure to present them in a way that reads well to someone who is going to only quickly glance at the document.
Make it highly scannable. Assume I won't read it carefully, but will definitely appreciate it being easy to read.
Inconsistent profile history on LinkedIn vs their resume.
Not adding their LinkedIn profile and GitHub link to their resume.
Having a very long resume which it should be a 1 or 2 pager is good enough. Since it becomes tedious and unfocus when it goes beyond two.
I totally agree with all of them. I would maybe add: keep it under 1 page.
What do you think?
Great suggestion / addition ❤️🦄
although “aim for one page” just for nuance, as sometimes you do need the space if you had a particularly complex role / depending on the role applying for!
I've never seen anything good come out of multiple pages.
Posted my answer before reading this one… 100% agreed.
I would go even harder on number 6. Dont include your hobbies at all.
It sounds harsh but truth is recruiters just dont care.
No, you don't understand. Commanding my orc army makes me great management material
🤣🤣❤️
You are right…but, when you get to interview stage it is nice for some interviewers if they have an ice breaker, so it is more for then!
However if I had to choose between every other section and this one I would certainly say ditch this one! 👍❤️
If including a hobby would cause resume to need an extra page, don't include it. If there is something more relevant that fits, then go with the more relevant thing instead obviously.
However, one line with a hobby or two at the very end has been useful to me personally long ago in the past on two occasions. The first was in 1995 while as an undergrad. I listed bowling. It was while interviewing for co-op positions (Drexel University where I went has a required co-op program). After talking about relevant stuff, the interviewer (president of company) mentioned bowling and we just talked informally a bit. I was offered the position, along with 14 others, and I went with this one over the others at least partially due to the friendliness of interview.
Two weeks into the job, the company organized a bowling outing. I don't think it was coincidental as multiple people already knew I bowled who I hadn't directly told.
The second useful time was in 2005 while interviewing for faculty positions. Faculty CVs are much longer than a typical resume---they have stuff like publication lists, grants, course development, etc (anywhere from 10 to 50 pages depending on experience). Near bottom of last page of around 20 or so pages I still listed bowling even though I hadn't been in leagues for a few years. After a long interview day, giving presentations and various meetings, during dinner with search committee, one committee member commented on that which lead to less formal discussion which was a welcome change of pace after 8 hours of interviewing. This is where I still work today 17 years later.
A hobby on your resume isn't going to get you an interview. But it might lead to a higher quality interview, whether it be an interviewer using it as an icebreaker to put you at ease, or in both of these examples an interviewer using it later in the interview. Hobbies are usually off-limits to interviewers (e.g., it's in a list of things we're not allowed to ask about during interviews at my institution). By including on resume, you give interviewer something they can potentially use to improve your interview experience that they otherwise can't bring up.
So if you have a spare line available at very end, it is fine to include a hobby. Just make sure all of the important job related stuff is more prominent, and don't sacrifice anything relevant to the job to make space for it.
I've seen contrary advice from people who do a lot of hiring, although it's been a while and I don't have a source offhand. I think a couple lines to show you have a unique personality if you have space for it isn't a bad idea. But only if they're interesting or unique, or can be made to sound that way.
To be honest, I saw both schools
I guess it depends on the company and the interviewer(s). Conversely, I'd rather work for someone who views me as a person, than someone who views me as a robot. So, if adding hobbies at all is a mark against me getting an interview, I'm probably better off. (This is nuanced of course given that there is a spectrum from "wow, this person totally overshared, trash" to "Who cares about
youyour hobbies? trash")True, but do recruitment agents care about anything other than getting their commission? - lol
More seriously: As a hiring manager I disagree. Team fit is almost as important as technical skills, if the candidate happens to have some hobbies that crossover with others in the team or might bring benefits to the company then that is interesting to know.
Also I think its healthy to know that people have hobbies an interests outside of sitting in front of a computer coding all day. I think it makes for a more well-rounded person.
Finally, one of the key reasons I got my current job is because I mentioned that I attended Toastmasters as a hobby. One of the owners of the company knew what that was and thought it was great I was involved with an organization to help improve public speaking skills. They happened to be looking for someone who could communicate clearly not just code.
I don't disagree, but I'm of the opinion that it's more important to be able to present your CV in the appropriate format than to actively maintain it in that format.
I maintain my CV as a Markdown file using Emacs Orgmode. That way I can keep it in version control, I can convert it to HTML and style it easily, and I can use Pandoc to generate versions of it in Word and PDF format as needed.
You are right, there is some nuance to what I am saying but it was a comment not an article and it would need a lot of explanation lol! 🤣
They way you have it set up is great and, as you said, some other formats may be appropriate in some circumstances, I was trying to give the best “for 90% of circumstances” advice.
I like the idea of having version control on a CV, should go one step further and build a tool that lets you have a list of skills / experience items and then it lets you select the ones relevant to the job role you are applying for, that would be epic!
Hey Matthew,
Just noticed that you used Markdown for your CV. I've worked on a similar side project where you can create your CV with Markdown. Would love for you to try it and share with me if you have any thoughts:
resumey.pro/
Congratulations for your project. Can you check your footer for the year?
Thanks Abel!
Ah yes haha, thanks for highlighting it!
Not only does the reader not know what 80% JavaScript means, the writer doesn't know how much of something that they don't know.
resume`s with every single technology possible for every single area just smell of someone keyword vomiting and actually has very little idea about how to use any of them because they have yet to specialize.
If you list half a dozen databases and your last few roles are centered around being a DBA I'll probably believe it.
If you list every front end framework, back end framework, database, cloud, language, os, it smells like lack of specialization.
Thanks for sharing such a useful point it will help in future when I try to build my resume. Site
regarding your point 5, should people put their pronouns on their bio to virtue-signal to any potential employer?
I would certainly say it depends on the employer and your view on adding them (which I would guess is you don’t like it from the wording so don’t bother or worry about it!)
FAANG or places like DEV absolutely include them if you feel comfortable doing so, smaller teams, probably not.
I would say that is one to decide when you explore the culture of a potential work place.
dang! I use skill level bars. I thought it was a nice visual way to order competencies from "best at" to "worst at". Of course it's not an exact science. It's a self assesment. It's like saying "I'm really good at Go, pretty good at HTML, not bad at Ruby, and I really like Rust but I'm new to it and don't fully understand it"
Hehe, don’t worry I have made most of these mistakes myself. The problem with them is actually worse than I made out. If you put a bar at full then your are signalling you know everything and that sets unrealistic expectations and leaves you wide open! If you put 75% then it looks like you have a lot to learn still as 1 in 4 questions you can’t answer. Neither of the scenarios work well so better to just leave them off. 👍
I wrote a post on this a few days ago -
How to write a good resume
Hrishi Mittal ・ Jan 14 ・ 3 min read
I actually have a question: would you add projects to your resumé? Why or why not?
I am guessing by
projectsyou mean portfolio of works you have done? If that is the case, I would suggest you include a link to the the portfolios for their viewing and not necessary add each project to the resume. Resumes should be at most 2 pagesAt my last two companies, I interviewed developers from all levels, intern to lead. The advice I'm going to share here is directed toward the interview loop, so it may be somewhat different than what you're used to seeing since most of the standard advice is about getting an interview in the first place.
First tip: Keep your resume to a single page unless you're a special case. If you're a special case, still keep your resume to a single page. I am going to read your resume, but I will only read the first page.
Second tip: What do I want to see on that first page? I want to see how you brought business impact to the last three companies you worked at. You have about ten minutes and maybe thirty lines to show off your proudest best-of-the-best achievements. Please don't waste them with any of the all too common throwaway statements like:
Here is a template you can follow, which I got from Lazlo Bock's book Work Rules (he was the head of people at Google):
A good example bullet point on your resume is something like:
Third tip: Follow business impact with the technical details and name the tools, frameworks, libraries, etc. that were used. Don't include anything you aren't prepared to talk about with details. The business context and impact is more important than the technical details because that's what determines whether or not your solution was good or not.
When we talk about your technical solution in its business context, I will hear how you think, and find out what constraints you had to work in and how you balanced making a business impact within those constraints, through the application of said technology.
Final tip: If your resume was awesome and your in-person was awesome, then that is when I will go back to my desk and look at your professional site, GitHub or whatever else you may have linked from your resume.
I really don't get this. This just feels way more bullshit marketing thing. I would rather have the "throwaway statements". It actually tells me what you were doing in that job and does it quickly. The "xyz" is also not feasible for a lot of people since they don't have access to metrics like those.
If written well, the Z is the "throwaway statement" but along with X and Y it explains how you brought value. This "value" doesn't make sense to a lot of developers because what developers appreciate most is hack value. But managers and directors appreciate business value instead.
Let me give a couple examples that hopefully help expand on the idea and show that you can include Z for hack value while also showing business value with X and Y:
Made 100 more developer hours available each year by implementing a data pipeline in Akka and Spark that gave business stakeholders the ability to dynamically retrieve data insights and eliminated ad-hoc service requests for data.
Improved customer experience, as measured by an average 150ms lower latency in service responses, by using JMeter and JVisualVM to identify and remove bottlenecks in a Java service.
Saved operating costs as measured by $100,000 lower AWS spend for 2020 by migrating services to the more performant Play! Framework and RxJava libraries, thereby reducing the size of service pools.
Hope it helps.
This actually makes a lot of sense. I just started out in my career but it really helps me to see what value my work actually bring
Do
Don’t
Gave some of my tips here
dev.to/bigboybamo/resume-tips-for-...
Not sure if this is different in the US, but for a UK CV, rather than list all the projects you've worked on, (and If you have the experience), try to quantify the business impact that your efforts have had. So rather than, "developed new error module for Cyberdyne" try "Increased sales of T-999 units by optimising workflow with new error module built on the HARM stack."
Keep it short and relevant: no need to put every single framework in there. Aim right for every single application.
Keep it very objective: "Did XXX project in Rails as a junior dev" is, "Security Expert" is not, skills bar/graph aren't either. Subjective things belongs to your cover letter, personnal website, social network. I include pictures of you in "not objective" (for countries where people add it).
Display actual results.
For example, I created a feature that has made XYZ ROI. Businesses like it when developers contribute to the business revenue.
Few things from my end:
We would need to understand what recruiters look for. Regardless of ATS (applicant tracking system) or a human reviewing your application, here's what they typically look for in a resume:
With this in mind, I would:
When I was a university student applying for internships, I found that including my personal projects and hackathon experience helped showcase my technical knowledge when I had no "technical experience". But describe them in a professional manner (for ex, don't add "Founder of app XYZ", unless it actually has customers)
Avoid multiple columns. Software readers can completely miss anything not in the left column.
Use keywords wherever you can fit them in. Tools, languages, deployment environments, use keywords that are popular in the job listings that you are seeing for your desired new positions.
Front load the things that make you look better. If you have a degree then put it near the top half, and explain what things you did in completion of that degree that make you a good developer. If you are light on experience, but have lots of projects then you should have a projects section. This is especially beneficial as it allows you to fit in lots of keywords.
When describing a job/position you write the bullet points as achievements. These achievements should explain the goal achieved and the means of accomplishing it.
If you use a summary/objective then it should be specific to you and not things that EVERY developer could say about themselves.
Watch this video:
Some comments may only be visible to logged-in visitors. Sign in to view all comments.