This post comes from some interesting tweets I saw, and really speaks to how difficult it can be to get the right amount of "correctness" when you seek to find out about how technology works.
Maybe you know the answer posed in the title, maybe you think you know, maybe you were afraid to ask. Lucky for you, @bnb came asking.
Several folks popped in with answers...
We have consensus, right?
Basic Internet research would back this up...
Case closed... Except.
That's a whole different story. But the whole Internet is telling me about "shorter range" at 5GHz.
I don't want to leave anyone here with an absolute conclusion, as I don't want to take anyone here "at face value".
If anyone wants to go deeper in the comments in the comments with some absolute facts on the issue, I very much welcome them.
Top comments (16)
I would like to answer with the conventional wisdom I've heard and anecdotes from my experience. However, it seems like a fact-checkable engineer's explanation would be best here. Kindof a commentary on the value of freely available information. 🙃
Real world.Depends on the WiFi reciever & walls, I guess. ¯_(ツ)_/¯
The range of 5G is better on my Intel WiFi Card & one Xiaomi phone(SD 845).
The range of 2.4G is better on the Realme, other Xiaomi devices, Nokia , Laptop and older USB Wifi.
Strictly speaking, in a vacuum, there is no difference in propagation range between 2.4GHz and 5GHz with all other factors being equal. All that matters is initial energy.
However, that’s not very useful in practice for two reasons:
These two factors combined mean that in the traditional setup of a single AP for a house or business, 5 GHz really does have less effective range. It’s not a ‘myth’, it’s just not some inherent aspect of ‘’5 GHz’ like everyone seems to imply.
Overall though, this is part of why ESS setups (sometimes (not always accurately) called ‘mesh’ setups in consumer marketing material) are so useful, and the limitations of 5 GHz are what is pushing their adoption in consumer settings.
Very interesting write-up, Ben.
My biggest pet peeve is the time it takes to reconnnect to a different AP when walking around in the apt. They already run in a mesh network, but the reconnect is still there.
Does anyone know if I am I just running cheapo hardware or is that something that is there to live by?
I agree with the penetration and range assertions. Another advantage 5g has over 2.4 is it operates at a higher frequency so it doesn't get as much RF interference. 2.4 is all over the place and it disrupts connectivity.
This is what should be addressed beside the range issue. I have a mobile BTS near my house and it's impossible to have 2.4GHz working normally (the AP is just about 1m away tbh). Switching to 5GHz and the connection is more stable.
As a technician who installs internet services the above assertions are true. 2.4ghz frequency travels further and has better penetration due to the lower frequency. 5ghz will provide faster speeds at a shorter distance. Most modems now are equipped to automatically divert traffic to the most optimal frequency.
There are some that don’t, which will cause issues with certain devices like printers and home cameras if you try to connect other devices to them that are on a 5ghz frequency. They will not talk to each other.
I remember the struggles with Wifi "in the old days" (partially attributable to how horribly Windows handled it), nowadays your ISP's modem almost always comes with capable Wifi built in, so in most cases we can just enjoy that & call it a day ;)
5-years-old version:
Suppose that wifi signal is like light. The 2.4 Ghz is red and the 5 Ghz is blue and green.
Thanks for your reply.
I asked Malte from one of your tweets (twitter.com/cramforce/status/14395...). He was very kind to state that this problem has been solved already. Not all hardware do solve it, but many do.
Great thread. I wonder if anyone has done any benchmarks. My AP supports 2.4 and 5 and I have to say I’ve had way less issues/problems with 5 even through distance and walls (live in a 30’s house with good size load bearing walls). This has certainly made me think and I might try to do my own experiments to find out more.