Brian Barbour

Posted on Jun 3, 2019

If Javascript Is Single Threaded, How Is It Asynchronous?

#javascript #webdev #beginners

Javascript is a single threaded language. This means it has one call stack and one memory heap. As expected, it executes code in order and must finish executing a piece code before moving onto the next. It's synchronous, but at times that can be harmful. For example, if a function takes awhile to execute or has to wait on something, it freezes everything up in the meanwhile.

A good example of this happening is the window alert function. alert("Hello World")

You can't interact with the webpage at all until you hit OK and dismiss the alert. You're stuck.

So how do we get asynchronous code with Javascript then?

Well, we can thank the Javascript engine (V8, Spidermonkey, JavaScriptCore, etc...) for that, which has Web API that handle these tasks in the background. The call stack recognizes functions of the Web API and hands them off to be handled by the browser. Once those tasks are finished by the browser, they return and are pushed onto the stack as a callback.

Open your console and type window then press enter. You'll see most everything the Web API has to offer. This includes things like ajax calls, event listeners, the fetch API, and setTimeout. Javascript uses low level programming languages like C++ to perform these behind the scenes.

Let's look at a simple example, run this code your console:

console.log("first")
setTimeout(() => {
    console.log("second")
}, 1000)
console.log("third")

What did we get back?

first
third
undefined
second

Feels odd, right? Well, let's break this down line by line:

console.log("first") is on the stack first, so it gets printed. Next, the engine notices setTimeout, which isn't handled by Javascript and pushes it off to the WebAPI to be done asynchronously. The call stack moves on without caring about the code handed off to the Web APIs and console.log("three") is printed.

Next, the Javascript engine's event loop kicks in, like a little kid asking "Are we there yet?" on a road trip. It starts firing, waiting for events to be pushed into it. Since the setTimeout isn't finished, it returns undefined, as the default, well because it hasn't been given the value yet. Once the callback finally does hits we get console.log("second") printed.

There's a really good site that slows this all down and shows this happening.

http://latentflip.com/loupe

I suggest playing around in this sandbox to help solidify your understanding. It helped me get a feel for how asynchronous code can work with Javascript being single threaded.

Top comments (47)

Eugene Karataev • Jun 4 '19

I like asynchronous nature of javascript because it helps me to sort arrays easily. No more bubble, selection, merge or quick sort algorithms. Timeout sort for the win!

let arr = [10, 100, 500, 20, 35];

arr.forEach(item => {
  setTimeout(() => console.log(item), item);
})
// 10 20 35 100 500

🤣🤣🤣

Bradley Griffith • Jun 6 '19 • Edited

did a flex-box version: jsfiddle.net/bradleygriffith/2dsag...

<div class="sorted-list" id="my-list"></div>

.sorted-list {
  align-items: flex-start;
  display: flex;
  margin: 0 -5px;
}

.sorted-list-item {
  margin: 0 5px;
}

const listEl = document.getElementById("my-list");
const arr = [10, 100, 500, 20, 35];

arr.forEach(n => {
  const itemEl = document.createElement("div");

  itemEl.className = "sorted-list-item";
  itemEl.innerHTML = n;
  itemEl.style.order = n;

  listEl.appendChild(itemEl);
});

AWCode0X • May 25 '22

It's amazing
good work

Eugene Karataev • Jun 6 '19

Ahaha, awesome! 😂

Anton • Aug 12 '21

half a second sort for 5 items, very quickly

Alex • Jun 4 '19

Unfortunatelly, this cute sorting algorithm doesn't work on values that < 1.

Eugene Karataev • Jun 4 '19

It also poorly works with floats (ex. [1.5, 1.4, 1.3, 1.2, 1.1]) and big numbers 😄

SAURABH BAKOLIA • Jul 26

Try with this example: [10, -100, 500, -20, 35];

Brian Barbour • Jun 4 '19

In the course I'm doing we had to use setTimeout as a way to avoid stack overflow. I don't think I'd ever do it in a real app, but it was an interesting trick.

timepp • Aug 17 '23

This is mostly equivlant with the following code

let arr = [10, 100, 500, 20, 35];
let sorted = 0
for (let i = 0; sorted < arr.length; i++) {
    for (const v of arr) {
        if (v === i) { 
            console.log(v);
            sorted++;
        }
    }
}

Nando • Jun 7 '19

I think you are a bit crazy, bro ;)

Nandan Kumar • Jun 4 '19

Hey Eugene,
Would you please help me understand how does this happen. Any link or reference would be very helpful.

TIA :)

Eugene Karataev • Jun 4 '19

Well, it's a joke and shouldn't be used anywhere in production code.

We iterate on every element (N) in array of numbers and ask a JS engine to log this number in the console after N milliseconds from now. So, these numbers will be logged in a sorted way, because time in our universe flows in one direction 😁

Nandan Kumar • Jun 4 '19 • Edited

Yes, indeed it's a joke and should not be used anywhere in production. But it's nice to know how things work, It took me some time to figure out but it was worth it.
Thanks 😁

James Q Quick • Jun 17 '21

This is amazing lol

Hamza Pasking Akhtar • Dec 15

Lol I just saw a content creator talking about this that she interviewed someone that wrote a code this way.

I mean it works, it's creative. 😂

Syed Aqeel • Jul 7 '21

This is called timeout sort I think :D

Abhishek Bhardwaj • Nov 17 '20

It has limitation that if any item of array contained number in billion or millions it will keep in waiting unless the time finish.

Prabhjeet Singh • Jul 15 '20

how does it sort with timeout? should it not pick items with index

Ryan Mattos • Aug 12 '22

genius

Prahlad Yeri • Jun 3 '19 • Edited

Not all apps are benefited by javascript's async nature though, only those which are I/O centric. Apps which are more CPU centric like those involving statistical computations or heavy algorithms tend to perform better with non-async languages like java and python.

But when it comes to web development, about 90% of them are pure Database/CRUD or I/O centric apps, hence javascript could be useful in most cases.

Totiimon • Jun 3 '19

Did you mean to say that some apps are not benefited by the fact that Javascript is single threaded instead? Having async functionality is not a bad thing since languages like Rust or Python have async funtionalities, but what they also have, is multi-threaded capabilities.

Prahlad Yeri • Jun 3 '19

Exactly, multi-threading or parallel computing is the key when it comes to a lot of tasks. In fact, to take the full advantage of the 4 cores of your CPU, multi-threading is a must. Async will never be able to do that however efficient it may otherwise be.

It all comes down to what your app needs to do. I/O bound operations are where async shines and you should make full use of that if your app is majorly I/O bound.

Sung M. Kim • Jun 4 '19

I've tried with setTimeout delay of 0, which I expected to run before third.

console.log("first")
setTimeout(() => {
    console.log("second")
}, 0)
console.log("third")
first
third
undefined
second

but I was surprised to see that second was returned last.

Oscar • Jun 5 '19 • Edited

The function in your timeout gets queued as a task. The script runs and once it is done (console.log('third')), the engine can handle the task queue and will execute the timeout callback. So, even though the timeout is zero, the function will not get called immediately.

There is a lot more to the topic and Jake Archibald wrote an amazing article about how this works. I highly recommend reading it:

jakearchibald.com/2015/tasks-micro...

Sung M. Kim • Jun 5 '19

Thank you, Oscar 🤜

Elijah Trillionz • Jun 27 '22

It's an interesting thing about it.
No matter the delay it will always come after the call stack is empty.
Try using this website loupe to see more of it.

realtimecarsten • Aug 15 '19

In most operating systems, the wait or sleep functions are lower bounds - wait(n) will wait for at least n time-units, but once the time is up, you will never know when your tasked is scheduled next - sometimes that can be really long.

Yogi Wisesa • Aug 18 '20

Hey Brian, coming from the future here. I'm a little bit confused by this statement "Well, we can thank the Javascript engine (V8, Spidermonkey, JavaScriptCore, etc...) for that, which has Web API that handle these tasks in the background. ", if the task is handled in the background so it's mean if the javascript isn't single thread right? since the code is executed in the same time. thank you!

Mostafa • Apr 14

Mastering this topic I considered as a fundamental of being a JavaScript developer, knowing more about JavaScript engine (compiler) , the browser mechanisms and critical rendering path ( CRP ) is very important thing! I advise the developers who want to be a rock in web development field, please go through this topics and learn them carefully and on top of that make a deep understanding of network layer like http requests, responses, cache, cookies, storage, sessions. And related stuff to a browser network.

Aleksandar15 • Jun 11 '22

I think you are wrong at this part ...we can thank the Javascript engine (V8, Spidermonkey, JavaScriptCore, etc...) for that, which has Web API....

We don't thank JS Engine for that, because Web API is not part of the JS Engine but the JS runtime environment provided by the Browser, also provided by the browser is the JS Engine itself (V8 for Chrome) and Callback Queue and the Event Loop.
The JS (V8) Engine is made up of Memory Heap & Call Stack.

Furthermore, the purpose of the JS engine is to parse/translate source code that we developers write into machine code that allows a computer to perform specific tasks on its hardware level.

marouaneat95 • Jun 7 '19

Great article but there's something I can't understand
Isn't the "console" considered a Browser API an not a built-in Javascript object? why doesn't the JavaScript handles the console.log() function to the console API in the same manner it does with well known async functions (setTimeout, setInterval...etc etc) and moves to the next line of code ? Same thing for DOM manipulation which depends on the DOM API?

Florian Rand • Jun 3 '19

Wow Brian, the video talk from Philip Roberts it's gold! thanks for sharing this!

Britain Green • Jun 3 '19

Great, Brian!

Varun • Jun 7 '19

Thanks Brian for sharing the video link.Its really amazing and easy to understand the complexity behind JavaScript's call stack/event loop/callback queue.

View full discussion (47 comments)

DEV Community

If Javascript Is Single Threaded, How Is It Asynchronous?

Top comments (47)

Read next

Day 7: Your input is valid 🖐️

Day 10: Ho-ho-hono! 🔥

Open source Hugo Theme for building SaaS websites: Saasify

Coming Full Circle: It starts and ends with Git and GitHub