Javascript is a sensation, largely due to the explosion of web development today. Many are inserted in it and others, at one time or another, will ...
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
I think it's worth noting that your dynamic import example relies on top-level await.
I think this is still a proposal isn't it?
Anyhow, probably worth-while not complicating your example with it. :)
Hy pentacular. Thanks for the reply and I agree with you. I've changed the example so it better fit the main explanation.
I love the dynamic import feature, I use it to dynamically import CSS π
Thank you for your blog post, a nice read and summary π
Thanks for reading David :)
Didn't we already have a Promise.all() what's the difference
Yes, we did. The difference is that Promise.all() didn't resolve the promises from array in then if it had at least one rejected.
Promise.all([Promise.resolve('resolved'), Promise.reject('rejected')]).then((r) => console.log(r)).catch(() => console.log('catch here!'));
Output
// catch here!
Promise.allSettled([Promise.resolve('resolved'), Promise.reject('rejected')]).then((r) => console.log(r)).catch(() => console.log('catch here!'));
Output
// [
// { status: "fulfilled", value: 'resolved' },
// { status: "rejected", reason: 'rejected' }
// ]
Ohh cool thanks for clarifying :))
The first example in Nullish Coalescing Operator the values should be switched around the
||
sYou have
'value not falsey' || undefined
which should actually beundefined || 'value not falsey'
, otherwise"value not falsey"
will always show even for a truthy value.('value not falsey' || true) === 'value not falsey'
I like the optional chaining feature.
Thanks for reading Ephraim :)
BigInt looks interesting.
Great article, there's a typo in Promise.AllSettled example, 2nd line: first "Promise.resolve"
Thanks for the reply Rajika. I've fixed the typo.