DEV Community

Cover image for Comparing WebRTC and WebSocket: Choosing the Right Technology for Real-Time Experience
Arjun Kava
Arjun Kava

Posted on

Comparing WebRTC and WebSocket: Choosing the Right Technology for Real-Time Experience

WebRTC vs WebSocket: A Comprehensive Comparison

In the realm of real-time communication on the web, two technologies stand out: WebRTC (Web Real-Time Communication) and WebSocket. Both offer unique advantages and are tailored to different use cases. This article provides an in-depth comparison of WebRTC and WebSocket, exploring their features, use cases, advantages, and disadvantages to help you decide which technology is best suited for your application.


Real-time communication is integral to modern web applications, enabling functionalities like video conferencing, live streaming, online gaming, and instant messaging. WebRTC and WebSocket are pivotal technologies in this space, each with distinct capabilities.

What is WebRTC?

WebRTC is a peer-to-peer communication protocol that facilitates real-time audio, video, and data exchange directly between browsers or mobile applications without the need for an intermediary server. It is designed to support high-quality media streams with low latency.

WebRTC Flow Diagram

Advantages of WebRTC

  1. High-Quality Media Streams: WebRTC is optimized for real-time video and audio communication, offering minimal latency and high quality.
  2. Encryption: Built-in security features such as DTLS and SRTP ensure that all communications are encrypted and secure from eavesdropping.
  3. Browser Support: Supported by most modern browsers, including Chrome, Firefox, and Safari, facilitating easy implementation and broad accessibility.

Disadvantages of WebRTC

  1. Complexity: Implementing WebRTC can be technically challenging due to its complex architecture involving numerous protocols and APIs like ICE, STUN, and TURN.
  2. Resource Intensive: WebRTC applications can be resource-intensive, especially when handling high-definition video streams, requiring significant bandwidth and processing power.
  3. Partial Browser Support: While broadly adopted, certain codecs or features may have inconsistent support across different browsers, potentially leading to compatibility issues.

What is WebSocket?

WebSocket is a full-duplex communication protocol that enables persistent, bidirectional communication between a client and a server over a single TCP connection. This makes it suitable for real-time applications that require continuous data exchange.

WebSocket Flow Diagram

Advantages of WebSocket

  1. Low Overhead: WebSocket reduces the overhead associated with traditional HTTP requests, making data transfer more efficient.
  2. Full-Duplex Communication: Allows for simultaneous two-way communication, which is crucial for interactive applications like online gaming and live chat.
  3. Wide Compatibility: Supported by all major browsers and easily implemented across various platforms and devices.

Disadvantages of WebSocket

  1. Stateful Connections: Maintaining a stateful connection can complicate scaling in large applications due to the need for persistent connections to each client.
  2. Connection Recovery: WebSockets don’t automatically recover when connections are terminated; this functionality needs to be implemented by the developer.
  3. Security: While secure over TLS (WSS), WebSocket lacks the built-in encryption mechanisms of WebRTC, requiring additional security implementations.

Key Differences Between WebRTC and WebSocket

Protocol and Connection Type

  • WebRTC: Uses UDP primarily (can work over TCP) and supports peer-to-peer connections【8†source】【10†source】.
  • WebSocket: Uses TCP and relies on a client-server model.

Data Transmission and Use Cases

  • WebRTC: Suitable for high-performance media streaming (video/audio) and real-time communications like video conferencing and live broadcasting.
  • WebSocket: Ideal for reliable data transmission, making it better suited for real-time messaging, multiplayer gaming, and live notifications.

Latency and Bandwidth

  • WebRTC: Lower latency and bandwidth usage due to its peer-to-peer nature.
  • WebSocket: Higher latency and bandwidth usage but ensures data integrity through TCP.

Use Cases

When to Use WebRTC

  1. Video and Audio Conferencing: Real-time video and audio calls directly within web browsers without the need for additional plugins or software.
  2. Live Streaming: For events like webinars or concerts, where low latency is critical.
  3. Real-time Gaming: Low latency communication ideal for online gaming interactions.
  4. File Sharing: Direct transfer of files between users in a peer-to-peer manner.
  5. Telehealth: Secure video consultations between patients and healthcare providers.
  6. Education and E-Learning: Facilitates interactive online learning experiences.

When to Use WebSocket

  1. Chat Applications: Instant messaging where messages need to be exchanged in real-time.
  2. Live Notifications: Updating users with live notifications, such as new posts or social media interactions.
  3. Online Multiplayer Games: Games requiring constant data exchange between players and the server.
  4. Financial Applications: Real-time updates for stock trading and financial transactions.
  5. Interactive Dashboards: Real-time updating of user interfaces, such as live stats or monitoring systems.

When to Use Both WebRTC and WebSocket

In some scenarios, using both WebRTC and WebSocket together can be beneficial:

  • Signaling in WebRTC: WebSocket can handle the signaling process required to establish WebRTC connections.
  • Complex Applications: Applications like multiplayer games or live broadcasting with chat might use WebRTC for low-latency media transmission and WebSocket for server-mediated tasks like state synchronization and user matching.


Both WebRTC and WebSocket are crucial for real-time communication, but they cater to different needs. WebRTC is ideal for high-quality, low-latency media communication, while WebSocket is perfect for reliable, persistent data exchange. Understanding their strengths and limitations will help you decide which technology best meets your application's requirements.


Can WebRTC and WebSocket be used together?

Yes, WebRTC and WebSocket can be used together to leverage their strengths for different aspects of an application, such as using WebSocket for signaling and WebRTC for media transmission.

What are the primary use cases for WebRTC?

WebRTC is primarily used for video and audio conferencing, live streaming, real-time gaming, file sharing, telehealth, and education.

What are the primary use cases for WebSocket?

WebSocket is best suited for chat applications, live notifications, online multiplayer games, financial applications, and interactive dashboards.

By understanding the capabilities and ideal use cases for WebRTC and WebSocket, developers can make informed decisions to create robust, real-time communication applications tailored to their specific needs.

Top comments (0)