DEV Community

Cover image for From x86 to ARM: How Apple Silicon is Destroying the Competition
arjun
arjun

Posted on

From x86 to ARM: How Apple Silicon is Destroying the Competition

Introduction

The first time I used the MacBook Air with the M1 chip was at a startup I worked for, and I was immediately surprised by something—it didn’t have any fans. Coming from a gaming laptop with dual fans for the CPU and GPU, this felt strange. I was used to the constant hum of cooling systems trying to keep my machine from overheating.

Curious about how capable this fanless MacBook Air could really be, I decided to push it by installing Android Studio to test its performance with Android development. To my amazement, everything ran smoothly, without a single lag or hang-up, and the laptop stayed cool—even while running on battery. In contrast, my brand-new gaming laptop would be heating up within minutes on Windows.

I couldn’t believe Apple had achieved this kind of efficiency, especially with a fanless design. That led me to dig deeper into Apple’s new ARM-based Silicon chips, and soon I understood the magic behind them—ARM’s RISC architecture. It wasn’t just about raw power, but the balance between performance and efficiency that truly set it apart.

Understanding x86 vs. Apple Silicon (ARM Architecture)
Before diving into performance, it’s essential to understand the fundamental difference between the x86 architecture and Apple’s ARM-based Silicon.

The x86 architecture, which has been around since the 1970s, powers most traditional computers and laptops, especially Windows machines. It's a Complex Instruction Set Computer (CISC), meaning it processes complex instructions in fewer steps but requires more power and generates more heat. Companies like Intel and AMD have been leading in this space, with x86 chips being optimized for raw power in tasks like gaming and professional computing.

On the other hand, Apple Silicon is based on the ARM (Advanced RISC Machine) architecture, which follows a Reduced Instruction Set Computer (RISC) model. Unlike x86, ARM chips handle simpler instructions that can be executed faster, which results in greater efficiency. These ARM chips have long been used in mobile devices, where battery life and low heat generation are crucial. Apple, however, took ARM to the next level by designing their own custom chips, like the M1 and M2, optimizing for both performance and power efficiency, making them suitable for high-end computing tasks.

This architectural shift gives Apple Silicon a massive advantage. While x86 prioritizes power and can be power-hungry and hot, ARM focuses on balance, providing high performance while being more energy-efficient and cooler—hence, fanless designs like the MacBook Air.

Performance
Apple Silicon's performance is mind-blowing, especially when you compare it to traditional x86 processors. In real-world benchmarks, Apple’s M1 and M2 chips outperform many Intel and AMD CPUs, particularly in multi-core tasks. Whether it's compiling code, rendering videos, or multitasking, Apple’s ARM-based chips deliver superior performance while maintaining remarkable stability. When I tested it with Android development, the M1 MacBook Air ran Android Studio effortlessly, with no lag or slowdowns—something that even powerful gaming laptops struggle with when running similar heavy workloads.

Graph Apple Silcon vs x86

Image description
credit:shroutresearch.com

Power Efficiency
One of the biggest advantages of Apple Silicon is its exceptional power efficiency. Coming from a gaming laptop with dual fans constantly working to keep things cool, I was astonished by how the MacBook Air stayed cool under heavy workloads. Even more impressive, it did this without fans and while running on battery. The ARM-based design allows Apple to maximize power efficiency, providing longer battery life and significantly reducing heat generation. This is a huge contrast to x86-based machines, which typically run hotter and consume more power, especially when pushed to their limits. My gaming laptop would heat up quickly and drain the battery at an alarming rate, while the MacBook Air just kept going.

Graph Apple Silcon vs x86

Image description
credit:-anandtech.com

Unified Architecture
Apple's decision to integrate hardware and software tightly through its ARM-based architecture is another key advantage. By designing both the chips and the operating system (macOS), Apple ensures optimal performance, seamless compatibility, and efficiency. The unified memory architecture, in particular, allows Apple Silicon chips to access the same pool of memory without bottlenecks, something x86 architecture still struggles with. This vertical integration gives Apple a unique edge over Intel and AMD, whose chips rely on third-party operating systems like Windows or Linux, creating inefficiencies in communication between hardware and software. This is part of the “magic” behind the M1’s ability to outperform its competitors, making even fanless models like the MacBook Air powerful enough for professional-grade tasks.

Conclusion
In conclusion, Apple Silicon’s ARM-based architecture has completely redefined the balance between power and efficiency, leaving x86 far behind. The performance I experienced, even in a fanless MacBook Air, was smooth and impressive, even for demanding tasks like Android development. With Apple’s tight integration of hardware and software, alongside superior power efficiency and cool operation, it’s clear why their ARM chips are outperforming traditional x86 processors. The future of computing is here, and it's powered by Apple Silicon.

Top comments (0)