DEV Community

Cover image for GitLab CI: Creating your own pipeline template library πŸ‘·
Minh Trinh
Minh Trinh

Posted on • Edited on • Originally published at Medium

GitLab CI: Creating your own pipeline template library πŸ‘·

As developers, we all know that it is a good idea to reuse code as much as possible. We all know the DRY mantra - Don't Repeat Yourself. Functions, classes or web components abstract away logic, parameterize data, allow code to be reusable, maintainable and extendable.

With GitLab CI/CD, pipelines are defined in YAML. It's a human-readable data- serialization language (Source), so its focus is clear and concise data delivery rather than efficiency optimization. It's often not obvious how we can go about reusing code in YAML.

Today, we're going to learn how to create CI template library - a library comprised of reusable job templates that can be shared, extended, and overridden by multiple projects πŸ‘Œ

But first, why should I create a CI template library?

If you're a developer working on a side project on GitLab, or if your team is relatively small and your projects are diverse in programming languages and build processes, then it's probably good enough to stick to a single .gitlab-ci.yml file.

On the other hand, as a company grows, it often has standardized testing, building, and deploying processes that are applied to most internal projects. A CI template library increases time efficiency in pipeline development and decreases update and maintenance effort across the ecosystem.

To build a template library, let's first dive into the basic component of it - the job template ⬇️

Job template

A job is a basic building block of a pipeline. It usually has a single purpose, executed in isolation and, most of the time, independent of other jobs.

For example, let's say we have an awesome Node.js app called awesome-node-app and we need a job to install dependencies before building it. The install job would look something like this:

# awesome-node-app/.gitlab-ci.yml

install:
  cache: 
    path:
      - node_modules/ # cache node_modules/ in subsequent pipeline
  script:
    # install dependencies in CI mode
    - npm ci 
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Now, a job template is essentially a job, but it has the following extra properties:

  • Generic: It is project-agnostic which means it does not contain any data that pertains to a specific project.
  • Importable: It is easily imported and used directly in a project.
  • Customizable: It can be extended or overridden.

If we examine the install job above once again, it seems like we could, and should, transform it into a template. We might want to reuse it in another JS application in the future!

It's already generic enough, but not quite importable or customizable. Let's change that.

Making a template

Create and include a template

To create a template, all we need to do is move the job to a new file, install.yml:

# awesome-node-app/install.yml

install:
  script:
    - npm ci 
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Then, we need to figure a way to "import" and use this job in .gitlab-ci.yml file. Luckily, GitLab has a pretty sweet keyword include that allows us to do exactly that!

πŸ’‘ include allows us to include and use content declared in an external yml or yaml file - either locally or remotely.

We already created install.yml locally, so let's include it at the top of our .gitlab-ci.yml, like so:

# awesome-node-app/.gitlab-ci.yml

include:
  - local: 'install.yml' # path to `install.yml`
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

The pipeline now has the job named install that does the same thing:

Alt Text

Using local file here probably won't make sense since we might want to reuse the template in another project and we do not want to just copy and paste the job definition. Remember, keep it DRY.

So let's go ahead and make a new template library that only stores templates! We can then refer to this library whenever we need to install.

Create a new repository ci-templates that's within the same group as awesome-node-app. Then, add install.yml at the root of the project. By now, you would have this:

ci-templates/
  | install.yml
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Then, commit and push to master. Cool! Now your library is up and accessible to other repositories.

Let's go back to awesome-node-app/.gitlab-ci.yml, and include install.yml again, this time using include:file directive:

# .gitlab-ci.yml

include:
 # group name is your username if the project is under personal account
  - project: '<my-group>/ci-templates'  
    ref: 'master'
    file: 'install.yml'
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

πŸ’‘We can modify ref to point to any other branch, commit SHA, or version tag of the file in Git history as we'd like. It's good practice to keep track of version history for your template file.

Great! We just basically told GitLab to "include this file install.yml from ci-templates repo on master branch into the pipeline". We now have install job imported from ci-templates to our awesome-node-app πŸ’ͺ

We can run the pipeline as-is - install is activated automatically without any further configuration.

However, what if we do want to change or add configuration?

Customize a template

Scenario: Right now, install only looks for dependencies declared in the package.json file at the root of a project. What if we have another-awesome-node-app that is a monorepo, and we want to run install multiple times in various locations?

another-awesome-node-app/
  | project_one/
  |__ package.json
  | project_two/
  |__ package.json
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

We need to parameterize our install template to take in some sort of data that holds information about the location of the package.json file we're looking for.

The most powerful way to parameterize a template is by using environment variables.

Environment variables come in two flavours:

  • Predefined environment variables: Variables provided by GitLab out of the box and ready to use without any specification.

πŸ’‘They are references to branch names, merge request IDs, jobs info, and much, much more.

Predefined environment variables are incredibly powerful. We can do things like conditionally skipping a job in a pipeline, allowing jobs to run on certain branches, leveraging custom variables, and so on.

This topic deserves a separate article of its own, so if you're interested in knowing more about their use cases and real-world implementation, let me know in the comments below πŸ’š

  • Custom environment variables: Variables defined in .gitlab-ci.yml (you can also define them in GitLab UI and via the API).

⚠️ Make sure to avoid name collision with predefined variables when naming your variable.

Custom environment variables work in great harmony with job templates. The syntax is as follow:

template:
  variables:
    # declare a key/value pair
    MY_VARIABLE: 'hello'
    ... # declare as many variables as you want 
  script:
    # call its value, this outputs "hello" in the runner
    - echo $MY_VARIABLE
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Notice that the variable is declared within the job scope. This means that the variable is only accessible within the job and inaccessible from pipeline level.

Going back to our example, let's create a new custom variable named INSTALL_DIRECTORY and call it in our install script:

# ci-templates/install.yml

install:
  variables:
    INSTALL_DIRECTORY: '.' # default to root directory
  cache:
    path:
      - $INSTALL_DIRECTORY/node_modules/
  script:
    # cd to the directory of package.json
    - cd $INSTALL_DIRECTORY
    # install dependencies in CI mode
    - npm ci 
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

One more thing before we move on, let's make the job hidden by default by changing the job name from install to .install. I'll explain how this works in just a bit.

# ci-templates/install.yml

.install:
  ... 
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Cool! Now we're ready to use this template in another-awesome-node-app. Let's include the template again:

# another-awesome-node-app/.gitlab-ci.yml

include:
  - project: '<my-group>/ci-templates'
    ref: 'master'
    file: 'install.yml'
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

We've just included .install, but this time, it's hidden, which means it's disabled by default. If you try running this pipeline in GitLab, it will not run simply because the pipeline is empty - there is no job!

So how do we use our template then?

Turns out, we can create a new job that extends our template to inherit its configuration.

Let's create two jobs install_project_one and install_project_two that extend .install. After that, we also need to change the default value of INSTALL_DIRECTORY in each job to the expected path:

# another-awesome-node-app/.gitlab-ci.yml

include:
  ...

install_project_one:
  extends: .install
  variables:
    INSTALL_DIRECTORY: 'project_one/'

install_project_two:
  extends: .install
  variables:
    INSTALL_DIRECTORY: 'project_two/'
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Awesome! Now both install_project_one and install_project_two inherit the script from .install, but they find the package.json file in two different locations just like we wanted!

⚠️ Had we not specified install a hidden job earlier, we would have had one extra install job declared in our pipeline that runs in the root directory - where there is no package.json. This will fail the pipeline.

πŸ“ To prevent side effects from including external jobs, it's good practice to declare all template jobs hidden and extend them when needed.

Going beyond templates

Mixins

We can also keep any other reusable snippets of configuration in the template library. I'd like to call them mixins.

Some mixin examples:

  • Bash scripts
  • Pipeline configuration partials

Here's one good example of what I meant by pipeline configuration partial:

.auth_gitlab_registry:
  services:
    - docker:dind
  before_script:
    - docker login -u $CI_REGISTRY_USER -p $CI_REGISTRY_PASSWORD $CI_REGISTRY
  after_script:
    - docker logout $CI_REGISTRY
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

This mixin logs the user into GitLab Registry before_script and logs them out after_script. However, it does not have script declared, which means that it cannot be run as a job.

πŸ’‘script is required for job definition.

To use the mixin, all we need to do is extend it the same way we do with regular templates and, most importantly, define what's in script in the new job:


include:
  ...

build:
  extends: .auth_gitlab_registry
  script:
    - docker build $MY_APP_IMAGE
    - docker push $MY_APP_IMAGE 
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Summary

Here's what we've learned today:

  • Properties of a job template: generic, importable and customizable
  • Include and extend a template
  • Use environment variables to parameterize templates
  • Hide a job to prevent side effects
  • Use mixins to further simplify the pipeline

I'm sure there are many other techniques in building a CI template not listed here. Please let me know in the comments what you think of my approach and any suggestions/recommendations for further optimization!

I hope you enjoyed this article πŸ’š

Cover photo by Pankaj Patel on Unsplash

Top comments (11)

Collapse
 
gregorip02 profile image
Gregori PiΓ±eres

Hi, thanks for sharing!

What if I want to re-use a series of scripts in my jobs? I know you could write separate scripts to files e.g. scripts/deploy.sh and call its execution whenever you need it in the .gitlab-ci.yml file.

The extends: .my-reusable-job sentence could be overwritten.

# .gitlab-ci.yml

.my-reusable-job:
  script:
    - echo "Hello from .my-reusable-job"

testing:
  extends: .my-reusable-job
  script:
    - echo "Hello from testing job"
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Only prints "Hello from testing job". My specific question is if I can use extends without overwriting it later?

Collapse
 
anhtm profile image
Minh Trinh • Edited

Hi Gregori! Thanks for posting your question :)

I think this is an intended feature for extends. If you want the reusable script to not be overwritten, there's 2 ways I can think of:

  1. Use before_script or after_script for reusable commands so that they're appended before or after the new script:
.my-reusable-job:
  before_script:
    - echo "First, hello world"

testing:
  extends: .my-reusable-job
  script:
    - echo "Second, hello world, again!"
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

This thus prints "First, hello world" and "Second, hello world, again!"

  1. Use YAML anchors to specify reusable scripts:
# &my_reusable_commands is the name of the anchor
.my_reusable_commands: &my_reusable_commands
  - echo 'First, hello world'

testing:
  script:
   # refer to the above anchor with *<anchor_name>
    - *my_reusable_commands
    - echo "Second, hello world, again!"
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

This will print the same 2 lines just like the first approach.

Let me know if you have any questions!

Collapse
 
gregorip02 profile image
Gregori PiΓ±eres

Thankssssss, it works πŸ™πŸΎπŸ™πŸΎπŸ™πŸΎπŸ™πŸΎ

Thread Thread
 
anhtm profile image
Minh Trinh

Awesome! πŸŽ‰ I'm happy to help :)

Collapse
 
tobiashochguertel profile image
Tobias HochgΓΌrtel

Hey Minh, that’s a well written article about GitLab-Ci templates functionality, and the first which is valuable. Why? because it just shows what is hidden by this GitLab term ci template, it’s like that you can search for this term and you end opening tabs over tabs because you find articles which all talk about this feature - but in a way which is so useless that you just learn β€žyes that is what I need now, they can do it, it’s existing...β€œ but they all forget the main point, you want to see how to implement / use it / done real work with it.

Please write more - I like your way, to show me β€žah okay, we have a Feature...β€œ, β€ž... and here you use it like thisβ€œ, β€ždo that..β€œ and you get it explained in one article without thousand additional links which you have to open to see a snippet, additional documentations on GitLab.com which all show you nothing usefully, and in the end you read a lot but you have no clue how to use this feature.

You got it done, in a way I like it very much - to write it down, on just one paper A4/letter which shows me how to implement and work with it.

So thanks, and how I can inspire you to write more articles, because you are do it great.

Collapse
 
anhtm profile image
Minh Trinh

Thank you Tobias for the kind words! You definitely inspired me to write more :D

I agree with you that articles around CICD is usually limited to being generic & theoretical. The reason, I think, is because it requires the author to have real hands-on experience on the tech (ie: gitlab ci/jenkins/etc) to really understand how to apply it in the real world. There are many implicit components to building a pipeline that only by reading the docs certainly isn't enough.

I'll try to write more "how to..." articles like this one in the future and hope to share my own insights on the subject (which I think is crucial to make an article useful)

If possible, please let me know what topic you'd like to read more from. Thanks!

Collapse
 
tobiashochguertel profile image
Tobias HochgΓΌrtel

I have few or one idea, as a follow up article, you could show how to make a a pipeline more generic, for example I have a pipeline for python which is also possible to do specific python projects like django, because there isn't to much difference. I use there often one-liner shell script steps like:

- "[ -f .env.ci ] && cp .env.ci .env"
- "[ -f manage.py ] && python manage.py test"
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

and then also how a reusable template can be used look, and used. For example:

my Project pipeline looks like this:

include:
  - project: 'infrastructure-hochuertel.work/gitlab-ci.yml'
    ref: master
    file: '/python/Python-Projects.gitlab-ci.yml'

variables:
  PROJECT_DIRECTORY: 'mysite'
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

I have only to overwrite one variable to select the correct directory which is to be used to test. That I have to set the variable has a repository structure semantic, I could also have all python project in the same directory of a new repository, but I do it like this. -because I will use the same template again for the same repository but with a different directory (to release python packages to pypi, we refactored some django-apps into python packages to reuse them).

the interesting thing which I have in mind is maybe this:
Another topic which is often not really clear is how to versioning with a pipeline, how can we trigger a release (manual by API, or by a specific trigger like changed file) in the way that we have not to do a change in the gitlab-ci.yml file (to activate release button, and then deactivate release button)...
Releasing and Versioning is often confusing topic when I look into development teams, mostly they have per project only one package which they "release" what they do is just deploy.

hmm, I could write more and more ideas, as I sit here and write down what I have in mind about what you could write, often topics which I have to cover myself, also.

  • Multi Pipeline Triggering,
  • How to release a new Documentation Version next to the already existing version of the documentation (think like the Java API documentation for each release), how could this be organized and done, maybe via gitlab pages feature, or different.
Collapse
 
avik735 profile image
Avi Bis

I created a profile just to comment and ask some questions. First of all, thank you for such a well written guide. There are very few articles on GitLab CI on the internet. Most are utterly theoretical and very few provides actual workable examples.

Coming to my question, I followed this guide to create a template repository. I have some job templates in the repo, and a pipeline config template which includes these locally available job templates. I am using the pipeline config as a template in other projects. One of the job templates is a maven build job, which looks like this:

.compile_commit:
  variables:
    POM: 'pom.xml'
  only:
    - branches
  tags:
    - ac-billing
  image: $IMAGE_PREFIX/maven:$MAVEN_TAG
  script:
    - mvn -f $POM $MAVEN_CLI_OPTS clean install $MAVEN_OPTS
  artifacts:
    paths:
      - target/*.zip
      - .m2/repository
    expire_in: 1 hour
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

In the pipeline config template, I have extended this job template as

include: '/job_templates/compile_commit.gitlab-ci.yml'
compile_commit:
  stage: build
  extends: .compile_commit
  variable:
    POM: pom.xml
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Finally, in the actual project (project A), I have included the pipeline config template as

include:
  - project: 'mygroup/ci_templates'
    ref: 'master'
    file: '/job_templates/pipeline.gitlab-ci.yml'

variables:
  POM: 'myfolder/pom.xml'
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

However, when I run the pipeline in project A, the build process fails to find the pom.xml path and the build fails. What am I doing wrong?

Collapse
 
anhtm profile image
Minh Trinh

Hi Avi, thanks for stopping by! It's amazing to see people like you finding the guide useful and actually following it.

I think the problem is that in your project A, you're declaring the variable POM: 'myfolder/pom.xml' on the pipeline level, and not on the job level. Hence it's perceived as a different variable from the original .compile_commit::variables::POM and GitLab does not parse it into the job

The easiest way to solve this is to make the template config job to be hidden, and then extend it again in Project A and change the variable POM:

In template config:

include: '/job_templates/compile_commit.gitlab-ci.yml'
.compile_commit_config: # make this job hidden
  stage: build
  extends: .compile_commit
  variable:
    POM: pom.xml
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

In Project A:

include:
  - project: 'mygroup/ci_templates'
    ref: 'master'
    file: '/job_templates/pipeline.gitlab-ci.yml'

compile_commit:
  extends: .compile_commit_config
  variables:
    POM: 'myfolder/pom.xml'  # add your variable inside the new job
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Another approach would be to set the POM variable to be at the pipeline level from the beginning (remove it from the job and add it in the pipeline level). Then, override it in your Project A like you did. However, I haven't tested this solution so I can't 100% tell you that it will work. But it's worth trying it out. Let me know if that works also!

Minh

Collapse
 
himito profile image
Jaime Arias Almeida

Thank you for sharing this !!! Very useful !

Collapse
 
anhtm profile image
Minh Trinh

Thanks for reading! :)