Admittedly, I have only looked at the code and not tested this with a screenreader, but I think you're overestimating the accessibility of this markup and CSS. Without JS, there's no changing of ARIA attributes alerting a screenreader user to these interactive elements, the checkbox input isn't labeled, you're treating items that usually don't get focus (like span) as interactive elements, there are no :focus styles, etc.
I know accessibility wasn't the focus of this exercise, but it's not even mentioned in your caveats or things folks get when they add in JS. While I 💯 agree with your closing sentiment, I'm too cognizant that, for some, mastery of CSS is all about trickery and challenges and not functionality and usability.
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
We're a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.
Admittedly, I have only looked at the code and not tested this with a screenreader, but I think you're overestimating the accessibility of this markup and CSS. Without JS, there's no changing of ARIA attributes alerting a screenreader user to these interactive elements, the checkbox input isn't labeled, you're treating items that usually don't get focus (like
span) as interactive elements, there are no:focusstyles, etc.I know accessibility wasn't the focus of this exercise, but it's not even mentioned in your caveats or things folks get when they add in JS. While I 💯 agree with your closing sentiment, I'm too cognizant that, for some, mastery of CSS is all about trickery and challenges and not functionality and usability.