DEV Community

Cover image for How I simplified my import paths in TypeScript
Andy Coupe
Andy Coupe

Posted on

How I simplified my import paths in TypeScript

I think as developers using ES modules we have all got to a point where import paths start to become ugly and unmaintainable - especially in large codebases.

With a couple of lines added to your tsconfig.json we can fix this.

Let's imagine we are importing a button into a file which is nested far away from the components directory.

import Button from '../../../components/button'
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

This doesn't look too bad but it can get quite annoying if you're having to do this regularly.

Jump over to your tsconfig.json and reach into your tool belt.

We can add a paths property to our tsconfig.json. By doing this we also need to add a baseUrl which our paths will use as a base.

{
    "compilerOptions": {
        "baseUrl": "src",
        "paths": {
          "@components/*": ["components/*"]
        }
    }

}
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Now we can use these paths in our application. @components will now map to src/components/*.

So our button import from before can now be used like so.

import Button from '@components/button'
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

It doesn't look like much but in a monorepo this improves your workflow and efficiency as a developer.

A short but hopefully helpful post for some importers out there.

Top comments (14)

Collapse
 
adam_cyclones profile image
Adam Crockett 🌀

Just a note about monorepos, look at tsc -b package1/tsconfig.json package2/tsconfig.json its helpful.

Collapse
 
cyberhck profile image
Nishchal Gautam

IDEs might get confused with this, if you're using an editor worth its salt, it should be able to do auto imports anyway.

Collapse
 
adam_cyclones profile image
Adam Crockett 🌀

It's needed for the Typescript compiler to understand packages that sit in sibling arrangements that are not resolvable in node style resolution. I use webstorm which is salty haha.

Collapse
 
patarapolw profile image
Pacharapol Withayasakpunt

Actually, it is resolved in VSCode, because it is also Microsoft's product.

Collapse
 
ryands17 profile image
Ryan Dsouza

But wouldn't Node complain after we transpile TS, as Node doesn't know about absolute paths?

Collapse
 
patarapolw profile image
Pacharapol Withayasakpunt • Edited

tsc will automatically resolve it.

ts-node and ts-node-dev currently won't, but can be fixed with -r tsconfig-paths/register.

Collapse
 
ryands17 profile image
Ryan Dsouza

Doesn't work. Created a simple example with absolute imports and then compiled it via tsc. On running node dist/index.js the compiled JS throws an error as the absolute paths are not resolved.

Thread Thread
 
andrewmcoupe profile image
Andy Coupe

Let's see your example buddy?

Thread Thread
 
patarapolw profile image
Pacharapol Withayasakpunt • Edited

It can be fixed via babel-plugin-module-resolver, though. Actually, Babel can do much more than tsc, and typescript can run under it as well.

Only just it doesn't help with the IDE.

Thread Thread
 
ryands17 profile image
Ryan Dsouza

I have two files:

src/index.ts

import { add } from 'utils/math'

console.log(add(2, 3))

src/utils/math.ts

export const add = (a, b) => a + b

My tsconfig.json - the rest is omitted

{
  "baseUrl": "./src",
  "paths": {
     "*": ["*"]
  }
}

After transpiling this to JS, it doesn't work just by calling node dist/index.js, where dist is the output folder. So the baseUrl is just for TypeScript as Node doesn't understand that.

Thread Thread
 
patarapolw profile image
Pacharapol Withayasakpunt

Now I really need to compile to JavaScript as you mentioned.

I summed up the solution, but not exactly that pretty.

Collapse
 
fullstackcoder profile image
fullstackcoder

That's a good one, I used it before. Although, personal feeling, the barrels (index.ts) is a better approach.

Collapse
 
andrewmcoupe profile image
Andy Coupe

You can use it with barrels 👍

Collapse
 
jonasgroendahl profile image
Jonas Grøndahl

Didn’t know about this, thanks!!