An interesting use case arrived yesterday, I loved the simplicity of the code so I thought I'd share it.
Code: boom π£
export function decimateArray(arr, passes = 1, fidelity = 2) {
let tmpArr = arr.filter((_, index) => index % fidelity === 0);
passes--;
if (passes) {
tmpArr = decimateArray(tmpArr, passes, fidelity);
}
return tmpArr;
}
Use case:
"I have a large array of xy coordinates, I need it to draw freehand on canvas but it's too much data to work with quickly, I just want to draw an approximate polygon. I want the array to be smaller so I can more efficiently loop through the data and I dont care about all of the data just the start and end."
How?
An array is fed in, if the index of the data is modulus of a passed in fidelity
then keep this data, also recursively run this dataset through itself by a given number of passes
.
In english please?
Large array goes in, smaller array with less detail comes out.
Top comments (4)
I would suggest 4 improvements (3 minor and 1 critical)
Critical bug
Minor suggestions
BTW sorry if I sound picky...
Array from with a function callback isn't as fast as mapping an empty array from an Array constructor. π€£
It's not the point that it's buggy, it's important that you can take my crappy code and make something better, success. Still the failure to pass args recursively is something il fix.
A good way to implement this if you already know the approximate length you want your array is:
while (arr.length > 30) arr = decimateArray(arr);
Nice catch I like this π