I haven't checked the example issue... I have corrected it. Thanks for this :)
yeah, I have come to the conclusion after performing the test with performance.now(). But it was wrong. Yes "for loop is the fastest"
and caching length inside the loop is fine!!
jsPerf was great
And to correct "for..of" is faster compared to for..in and forEach but indeed for is the fastest one over all others.
Thanks for listing out these points.
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
We're a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.
foris the fastest one over all others. Thanks for listing out these points.