DEV Community

Dice Rolling Program

Aaron McCollum on July 24, 2020

Recently I started playing a game of Dungeons and Dragons with friends, and the first night I noticed I lacked the various sets of dice you need to...
Collapse
 
pentacular profile image
pentacular • Edited

You repeat yourself a lot. :)

The following technique may help avoid that.

const d = (sides) =>
  () => Math.ceil(Math.random() * sides);

const d20 = d(20);
const d12 = d(12);

console.log(d20());

Here d is a function which generates parameterized functions by using lexical closure.

Collapse
 
shadowtime2000 profile image
shadowtime2000

You don't need to have a function that returns another function. You can simplify it to this:

function d(sides) {
  return Math.floor(Math.random() * sides + 1);
}

And use it with this:

console.log(d(20));
Collapse
 
aaronmccollum profile image
Aaron McCollum

Mind blown. Thank you all! I'm just now getting into ES6 and shorthand functions etc. I just love how there are ways to do in 10 lines what I did in ~50-60 lines. Incredible.

I'll be referencing this when I update the code in the next few weeks. Thank you both!

Collapse
 
pentacular profile image
pentacular

That's true, but his code wants to call functions directly.

Also, why are you adding 1 and then flooring?

Thread Thread
 
shadowtime2000 profile image
shadowtime2000

I am adding one because Math.random() returns a float between 0 and 1, but it never includes 1, so you could never get 20 without adding 1.

Thread Thread
 
pentacular profile image
pentacular

Why not use Math.ceil?

Thread Thread
 
shadowtime2000 profile image
shadowtime2000 • Edited

Because some dice don't have zero while other's do. So we would need to switch on different dice.

Thread Thread
 
pentacular profile image
pentacular

But you're always adding one, so you'll never get zero ...

Thread Thread
 
shadowtime2000 profile image
shadowtime2000

Exactly. We would remove that but we would need to switch between Math.ceil and Math.floor.

Thread Thread
 
pentacular profile image
pentacular

Making a function more complex in order to make it simpler to do something the function does not do is not very sensible. :)

Thread Thread
 
shadowtime2000 profile image
shadowtime2000

What if we just did something like this:

function d(sides, hasZero = false) {
  return hasZero ? Math.ceil(Math.random() * sides) : Math.floor(Math.random() * sides);
}
Thread Thread
 
pentacular profile image
pentacular

If you want to generate integers in a range, you might as well just do that.

But the first thing to check are the requirements for this use case.

I believe that none of these dice include zero. :)

Collapse
 
christinamcmahon profile image
Christina

Great job! It looks like the other commenters beat me to it as far as suggestions since I was also thinking of ways to have code that is more DRY (Don't Repeat Yourself). Overall, I love seeing you go from idea to useful app! If you do end up writing a function that lets you pass the sides as an argument, you could add a feature so that the user can enter a custom sided die. Good luck!