This was my concern, too. If, and it's a big if, they push GraalVM and help Spring to make something that "just works" - I'll be interested.
I understand why they say it's OpenJDK 11, because LTS, so I would hope they have later versions too, otherwise there's an awful lot to catch up on by the time 17 launches as LTS later this year.
This was my concern, too. If, and it's a big if, they push GraalVM and help Spring to make something that "just works" - I'll be interested.
I understand why they say it's OpenJDK 11, because LTS, so I would hope they have later versions too, otherwise there's an awful lot to catch up on by the time 17 launches as LTS later this year.
Pushing GraalVM is on our Roadmap. However, not at the top so far, but we are reevaluating at least every quarter :)
# Push it, push it real good # - Salt N Pepa
(Please.)
They adresss this in the short Q&A at the end of the announcement article.
I assume you mean the OpenJDK11/17 issue, because I don't see any mention of Graal in the official announcement article...
Yes, I was referring to future JDK versions.