You end with a linear history, that for me it is cleaner. Because, from my point of view, is clearer to view the history of the project making easier to track changes, issues, bugs.
When I only used "git merge", I was getting really frustrated about reviewing the project history.
If you don't use it, I suggest you check it.
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
We're a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.
In your opinion, what is the advantage of git rebase over a standard push/merge/pull
You end with a linear history, that for me it is cleaner. Because, from my point of view, is clearer to view the history of the project making easier to track changes, issues, bugs.
When I only used "git merge", I was getting really frustrated about reviewing the project history.
If you don't use it, I suggest you check it.