I have helped quite a few clients with their Node.js serverless projects. In doing so I have seen some recurring mistakes around async/await.
...
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
const sleep = (ms) => new Promise(r => setTimeout(r, ms)); // from the linked post
[1, 2, 3].forEach(async (num) => {
await sleep(50);
console.log(num);
});
console.log('all done');
prints:
F:\projects>node x.js
Done
1
2
3
F:\projects>
I understand why 'all done' comes first, but the console.log's all print as expected. of course they come after 'all done', but the article and the link don't explain why the console.logs wouldn't work, because it appears they do. It might be because the linked article used a preproduction v 7 node where async/await/promises weren't quite working. or something.
node 10.x
Yeah, I see the same behaviour as you in Node 8, so it's possible the
console.log
issue is related to Node7.But it wasn't the problem that I was hoping to highlight (my bad!), which is that it doesn't behave as you'd expect when you
await sleep(50)
inside anasync
function. It has stung me in the past where we had something along the lines ofwhich fails because by the time
doSomethingElseAfterAllResultsAreProcessed
runs the results haven't actually been processed in theforEach
. Once you understand the problem it's easy to see why it behaved that way, but it wasn't intuitive as the time of writing the code (which is why I actually made this mistake multiple times before I eventually "learnt the lesson").haha, you're not alone in this - I have run into the same problem (it's not isolated to Lambda by the way) multiple times myself before it's finally carved in stone in my head. It's a systematic failure on the part of the language that it doesn't work intuitively, and unless it improves at the language level we have to (sadly) rely on memorization and building up muscle memory individually.
Great post! Im still guilty of some errors after all those years ;)
Thank you, I've made these mistakes before as well. That forEach thing has stung me multiple times and it was a pain to debug!
Why using a callback instead of an async function would be a mistake? Why wouldn't the callback work or be less efficient?
You can use callback instead of async, but probably shouldn't mix the two as it gives off the impression that you can return early before the async function's promise resolves. Which is not the case, the Lambda invocation will finish and return to the caller with a response when the async function's promise resolves at the end.