Next meets React (3 Part Series)
I am currently reworking on my own personal blog with React and Next.JS on the frontend and Express powering the backend.
So why am I redoing my blog from scratch? Before I could launch an MVP of the blog, I had to work on the SEO and also make it easier for web crawlers, which in turn helps with a great search engine score and indexing. I had two options:
- Write my own express server to serve my React app
- Use libraries like
So I tried them all and the journey was not that fine:
When creating my own express server, I suffered from a
webpackversion inconsistency problem. This took me like forever, I was deleting the
yarn.lockfile and also the node_modules over and over, I also tried the
npmsuggestions but nothing.
When working with
react-snap, it worked perfectly locally on my laptop but kept on failing my
After all the hard work and almost a months time wasted on SSR, I kinda gave up and just launched my blog. On a particular day, I was listening to the Full Stack Radio Episode 99 where he was interviewing Tim Neutkens about
next, I took note of four words about
...server rendered client applications.... I quickly opened a new tab, visited
next website, that was my eureka moment.
- Server Side Rendering out of the box Next handles SSR in such an easy way. Install, run your app, open your browser, you got SSR. Some advantages of SSR are rich link previews.
Next also handles serving of static files. No need of extra libraries.
CSS in JS
CSS in JScomes in built in
next, there is no need to install other
packages such as
It handles most parts automatically such as the SSR functionality but
next still allows customization over
- Progressive Web Apps
Creating a PWA is way too easy with
next...Stat tuned as we will look into
Ready for production
Next is super fast and it's optimised for smaller build size making your web
app size realy small and faster.
Next also handles most of your setup process such as file system, routing, hot code reloading and universal rendering.
Used by most known companies
Among the reasons why Stackshare is successful is
because developers like to know which stacks companies like Netflix use
to scale their application, so that we learn them, put them on our resumes and
maybe make a score on the interview.
- Handles static and dynamic sites
Next handles static and dynamic sites seamlessly no need to add extra
- Smaller learning curve
You will still write React, you will not experience the
Angular 1 and
Angular effect. Next handles somethings that will save you a lot of time such as routing but I will get more into details on the next article, Stay tuned
How is this framework so perfect? Well its not, it has its own flaws such as:
Implementing Redux might be a hustle, especially during setup.
- Handles way too much
Next handles a lot of functionality that you might take for granted, if you do you might ignore looking into them while.
Note: If you are looking into using
react-scriptsfor a while until you have grasped important concepts especially
So far those are the disadvantages I know, if you happen to know or face a couple more, please share so that I add them to this post. You can do so via comments or a twitter mention.
In this post we were able to:
- Look into why I started to look into
- Advantages of
- Disadvantages of
On the next part of the
Next meets React series we will work on a simple web app to grasp each and every
Note(no bad blood): Why you should choose
nextis just my opinion, I have no problem with you handling SSR on your own nor do I have trouble with devs using
Providing feedback about this article will be highly appreciated. Reach out on twitter wachira_dev or on this platform through chat.