If you ask any front-end developer which is better, Bootstrap or CSS Grid; the answer you'll receive is "it depends." I'd like to give some unbias...
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
I tend to like using Grid and Flex rather than frameworks. I used to use Zurb Foundation, but found myself overriding the elements and css classes (or at least portions of them) more often than I felt was reasonable. I do use Grid and Flex within the same project often as they have different strengths for doing different things.
Over time, I felt that using the built-in CSS3 tools just gave me more freedom. I didn't really have to remember all of the class names for foundation (is it small-column 3, small-3 column, or small-3 cell....) and could focus more on the design my wife has given me (she's the UI/UX designer for our consultancy) than bouncing back and forth between my project and the docs for a given framework.
That is just me though. Personally, the less I can change gears, the better. The time savings of writing 20-30 lines fewer of CSS and HTML usually gets offset by me being "thrown out of a groove" when laying things out. I totally agree though, each have their strengths. For me, I'd rather use the languages built-in, standard lib stuff than reach for an external framework. Usually because if I can build something in straight-up CSS, or Vanilla JS, or Python's standard library, I can better understand what's happening under the hood if and when I need a dependency. Just works better for how I personally approach problem solving.
I think we no longer need to use bootstrap grid but we probably need to use other predefined classes of bootstrap.
Appreciate the article man thank you for taking the time, definitely had all the info I'd been needing.