Not a Rust or C++ programmer, but I’ve seen similar comparisons between Go and C (and I’ve used both), and there’s this same dichotomy of “C is dead, Go reigns supreme” and “C is still useful, Go is dead/just another language.”
Whatever you can do in Go, you can do it in C probably much quicker (yes there are exceptions, but for the most part this is true), but there are also many applications that are more efficiently written in Go AND are more concise than C (again, there are exceptions, but for the most part this is true).
I think we can extend this argument to Rust and C++ as well. There are use cases when writing Rust code is probably better than writing C++ and vice versa. It just depends on what you’re writing. I doubt that C++ will go away soon, but i wouldn’t be surprised if it became confined to maybe a few use cases.
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
We're a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.
Not a Rust or C++ programmer, but I’ve seen similar comparisons between Go and C (and I’ve used both), and there’s this same dichotomy of “C is dead, Go reigns supreme” and “C is still useful, Go is dead/just another language.”
Whatever you can do in Go, you can do it in C probably much quicker (yes there are exceptions, but for the most part this is true), but there are also many applications that are more efficiently written in Go AND are more concise than C (again, there are exceptions, but for the most part this is true).
I think we can extend this argument to Rust and C++ as well. There are use cases when writing Rust code is probably better than writing C++ and vice versa. It just depends on what you’re writing. I doubt that C++ will go away soon, but i wouldn’t be surprised if it became confined to maybe a few use cases.