DEV Community πŸ‘©β€πŸ’»πŸ‘¨β€πŸ’»

Cover image for Why blockchain challenges conventional thinking about intellectual property
samirmagar1
samirmagar1

Posted on

Why blockchain challenges conventional thinking about intellectual property

Cryptographic forms of money certainly stand out, but finance is only one of the many uses of the blockchain innovation behind it.

Blockchain innovation is poised to reform almost everything from supply chains (including illegal fishing and the denial of basic freedoms) to conservation and welfare.

It thrives in an open source environment, which raises the question of whether our ongoing licensed innovation regulations are good for promoting progress.

A hypothesis of the motivational power of the regulation of licensed innovation

Licensed innovation regulations such as licenses and copyrights are based on the motivational force hypothesis. To encourage individuals to make money, they are basically given an infrastructure to restrict their speech (for certain special cases) and they can go to court to prevent others from copying their work.

The developed world has greatly intensified the tension between pioneers and freeriders. In the pre-computer era, copying a book entailed significant copier costs. Considering that advanced records can be replicated ad infinitum at almost zero cost, one could argue that we really want much tighter IP regulations to prevent wild and non-linear replication.

In any case, the hypothesis does not necessarily coincide with reality. History is littered with cases where licenses have hurt, not helped, development.

James Watt's steam engine was developed over existing steam engines, but the innovation could not be based on Watt's licenses. It was only after the licenses expired – one of which was mysteriously extended by Parliament – ​​that steam power made its way into the tumult of modern times.

We shouldn't be shocked that patent regulation can hurt progress. The English Crown used licenses to raise revenue and licenses were allowed over normal goods like salt. Such was the public outcry, James I had to distance himself from the current syndications and simply appreciate them as a new development.

In the US, licenses were granted for developments, such as material and a turning machine, which the public authority knew had been taken from the United Empire. In 1950, renowned financial analyst Fritz Machlup, in his survey of the patent framework for the US Congress, composed:

In the event that we do not have a patent framework, it would be untrustworthy, based on our current information about its monetary results, to propose its establishment. Still, since we have had the patent framework for some time, it would be noble, based on our current information, to suggest its repeal.

The use of regulation by nations to protect themselves at the expense of others is of course not limited to licenses. At one time, the United States was a brazen privateer of copyright. The US was quick to instruct its population not to allow copyright insurance for works distributed by non-residents such as Charles Dickens.

Open source and IP regulations

The first blockchain application, bitcoin, was not licensed. It's not remarkable in that way. Sir Tim Berners-Lee did not patent the Internet. Similarly, the Web was provided to people generally exempt from patent restrictions.

The absence of licenses suggests that the pace of blockchain improvement has been downright staggering. Bitcoin, delivered in 2009, creates some block memories (the time it takes to record an exchange) of almost 10 minutes. Delivered in 2015 and intended to correct some of Bitcoin's shortcomings, Ethereum takes almost 14 seconds to create some block memories.

The way to fast blockchain progress is that the source code is open source. Individuals can duplicate and refine the code. Unlike restrictive programming, a purposeful decision is made not to use intellectual property regulation to protect the source code.

Conventional businesses also work on confidential items for a long time until they are delivered. On the contrary, many blockchain business visionaries make sense of what they are doing before they have anything to deliver. Some even provide this data before they start building anything. Others can use these ideas to create competing items.

To be sure, blockchain has turned regular thinking on its head. In the event that a local area could do without what a blockchain innovation does, the blockchain can split (duplicate the blockchain and its information) and create rival ones. This is what happened when Ether Exemplary (a duplicate of the Ethereum blockchain) and Bitcoin Money (a duplicate of Bitcoin) were created.

Development is moving forward rapidly to the extent that the Bitcoin blockchain is currently a relatively crude innovation. Later innovations such as Particle and Hashgraph make blockchain obsolete. Be that as it may, without Bitcoin there would be no particles or hashgraph - both of which were intended to fix the limitations of the blockchain.

Open source is a feasible plan of action

Individuals can bring cash without any trace of protected innovation security. Huge partnerships have made their money by using open source programming and offering other types of assistance for which they charge fees.

Red Cap, an open-source software organization, generates more than $2 billion in revenue. IBM is building blockchain answers for various global organizations, for example Maersk and Walmart, using Hyperledger Texture, an open-source program from the Linux Establishment.

The question is: Are our ongoing licensed innovation regulations appropriate for any reason if three vista-changing advancesβ€”the Web, the Internet, and now blockchainβ€”are thriving without assurances under those regulations?

If Machlup's words are taken into account, it would indeed be ill-advised to abolish patent regulation unless other frameworks are set up. In the interim, with respect to the regulation of intellectual property, the Australian Regulatory Change Commission is prescribing that fair use should be practiced in Australia to encourage development. New Zealand should follow this suggestion.

If you want to get rich with bitcoins, you can access from
>>Here<<How to get rich with Bitcoin even if you have no idea about the technology

Do you like to reap massive profits from cryptocurrencies?
[[Get access >>here<<]]()*

Top comments (0)

We are hiring! Do you want to be our Senior Platform Engineer? Are you capable of chipping in across sysadmin, ops, and site reliability work, while supporting the open source stack that runs DEV and other communities?

This role might just be for you!

Apply now