DEV Community

Discussion on: Explain Facebook's BSD+patents license like I'm five

Collapse
 
s_anastasov profile image
Stojan Anastasov • Edited

It's a standard BSD license except if you sue Facebook for patent infringement. FAQ

IMO the biggest issue is not being standard. Most big companies have there legal departments check and approve standard licenses like MIT, Apache2 etc... This is something different. Different is scary.

Collapse
 
ben profile image
Ben Halpern

So would you consider the backlash to be overblown?

Collapse
 
s_anastasov profile image
Stojan Anastasov

The BSD + patent licence put developers in position to choose OSS libraries for non-technical reasons -> the licence. Some examples are Wordpress and the Apache foundation.

I think is's good they changed it.

Collapse
 
rysilva profile image
Ryan Silva • Edited

Facebook's position was that if everyone started using this license, it would cut down on patent litigation. That might be true but I don't think it would be a good legal deterrent in practice. On the one hand, if you ask your legal department's permission to use React, they probably won't get on board with being bound to never sue Facebook; they don't care how great React is. On the other hand, if you use React without getting permission from Legal, and your company is thinking about suing Facebook over patent infringement and they find out about React, it might be a deterrent. But you can also bet some engineers are going to get fired.