For loops are faster than map, filter, and reduce. They always will be since they don't have the overhead of call backs. Correct your post at the beginning
"it's faster than the other version" needs to be removed
You are correct, Thanks. I have updated the article to reflect the same and added a footnote for performance.
Are you sure you want to hide this comment? It will become hidden in your post, but will still be visible via the comment's permalink.
Hide child comments as well
Confirm
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
We're a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.
For loops are faster than map, filter, and reduce. They always will be since they don't have the overhead of call backs. Correct your post at the beginning
"it's faster than the other version" needs to be removed
You are correct, Thanks. I have updated the article to reflect the same and added a footnote for performance.