DEV Community

Discussion on: Stop Calling them ‘Bugs’

Collapse
 
qm3ster profile image
Mihail Malo

Do you also support the renaming of the master git branch that you referenced?

Collapse
 
mcsee profile image
Maxi Contieri

Yes. It is an outdated name that has not much concern in computers but much impact on real world related to groups that have been suffering. So why not?

Collapse
 
qm3ster profile image
Mihail Malo

Idk, just wanted to know your opinion, since you referenced it.
Myself, I disagree with both halves. Performativity is harmful, giving words power like that is harmful.
The term is uniquely fitting, as it derives from "master copy" and not the maybe potentially unpleasant analogy that's used with bus clocks. Even trunk would have been better, but nothing conveys the notion of "this branch is what the software is" quite as well.

Thread Thread
 
mcsee profile image
Maxi Contieri

We agree to disagree :)

how about the term 'bug' ?

Thread Thread
 
qm3ster profile image
Mihail Malo

Yeah, it's pretty irresponsible. But how do we rename debug builds, debug asserts, and most importantly, the debugger?

Thread Thread
 
mcsee profile image
Maxi Contieri

I don't have the final word.

My votes would be
1) testing builds
2) asserts (should be turned on on production as well)
3) .... tracer

Thread Thread
 
qm3ster profile image
Mihail Malo

teleports behind you
removes all asserts and logging statements at compiletime
Nothing personell, kid
😎