That's interesting! I didn't know there was a list like that of all the emoji kept up to date from the consortium. Looks like a hassle to parse!
I imagine that the manually built mapping allows more expressive keywords to be added to the JSON, rather than trying to determine them from the short description. That's definitely a trade off between ease of maintenance and keyword accuracy.
I didn't know emoninja existed though. I'm excited that it does as I'll be able to use it in my Ruby projects when I need emojis too. Thanks!
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
We're a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.
That's interesting! I didn't know there was a list like that of all the emoji kept up to date from the consortium. Looks like a hassle to parse!
I imagine that the manually built mapping allows more expressive keywords to be added to the JSON, rather than trying to determine them from the short description. That's definitely a trade off between ease of maintenance and keyword accuracy.
I didn't know emoninja existed though. I'm excited that it does as I'll be able to use it in my Ruby projects when I need emojis too. Thanks!