I think jQuery lived because of web browser wars; and ES6 and Webpack replaced it.
Right now, you can actually code fine with vanilla JS. Going for something new would be ES dev server or Vite, but I can really bet on it yet.
I agree. You can code fine with vanilla JS. That's exactly my point.
jQuery is essentially redundant at this stage, but it remains relevant because of its past popularity.
I think it is likely that the comparable popularity of these JS frameworks will prevent them from dying out quickly—even if they become replaceable.
Are you sure you want to hide this comment? It will become hidden in your post, but will still be visible via the comment's permalink.
Hide child comments as well
Confirm
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
We're a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.
I think jQuery lived because of web browser wars; and ES6 and Webpack replaced it.
Right now, you can actually code fine with vanilla JS. Going for something new would be ES dev server or Vite, but I can really bet on it yet.
I agree. You can code fine with vanilla JS. That's exactly my point.
jQuery is essentially redundant at this stage, but it remains relevant because of its past popularity.
I think it is likely that the comparable popularity of these JS frameworks will prevent them from dying out quickly—even if they become replaceable.