var arr1 = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 0]
var arr2 = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 0]
var arr3 = []
var date = Date.now();
for (let i = 10000; i > 0; i--) {
var arr =[];
Array.prototype.push.apply(arr, arr1);
Array.prototype.push.apply(arr, arr2);
arr1 = arr;
}
Date.now() - date;
This gives the exact same performance as the concat function, basically creating the new object is the one which is costing the extra perf.
I mean concat function, actually creates a new array and append existing array into that, that is costly affair considering that it will constantly increase 10, 20, 30,40.... 99990entries in it and append in hte next iteration
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
We're a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.
I modified the code
This gives the exact same performance as the concat function, basically creating the new object is the one which is costing the extra perf.
I mean concat function, actually creates a new array and append existing array into that, that is costly affair considering that it will constantly increase
10, 20, 30,40.... 99990entries in it and append in hte next iteration