We use Gerrit where I work, and I generally like it. The UI is tolerable with the newer beta design :)
The issue I have with it is that it only allows single commits to be reviewed. I find this to be limiting, as it requires one to amend a commit to address code review feedback. You also lose all the history of the changes in git. Gerrit does store the history of a review as patchsets whenever you push the amended commit with the same Change-Id and provides diffs which is nice, but this history is not stored in git itself (afaik).
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
We're a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.
We use Gerrit where I work, and I generally like it. The UI is tolerable with the newer beta design :)
The issue I have with it is that it only allows single commits to be reviewed. I find this to be limiting, as it requires one to amend a commit to address code review feedback. You also lose all the history of the changes in git. Gerrit does store the history of a review as patchsets whenever you push the amended commit with the same Change-Id and provides diffs which is nice, but this history is not stored in git itself (afaik).