Don't know if the use of Parallel.ForEach is legit, but here's my take using C# and Linq
static void DoWork(int[] original) { var res = new int[original.Length]; for (int i = 0; i < original.Count(); i++) { var notCurrent = original.Where(x => x != original[i]); int sum = 1; Parallel.ForEach(notCurrent, (notI)=>{ sum = sum*notI;}); res[i]= sum; } }
Are you sure you want to hide this comment? It will become hidden in your post, but will still be visible via the comment's permalink.
Hide child comments as well
Confirm
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
We're a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.
Don't know if the use of Parallel.ForEach is legit, but here's my take using C# and Linq