I've been a professional C, Perl, PHP and Python developer.
I'm an ex-sysadmin from the late 20th century.
These days I do more Javascript and CSS and whatnot, and promote UX and accessibility.
I've been a professional C, Perl, PHP and Python developer.
I'm an ex-sysadmin from the late 20th century.
These days I do more Javascript and CSS and whatnot, and promote UX and accessibility.
I've been a professional C, Perl, PHP and Python developer.
I'm an ex-sysadmin from the late 20th century.
These days I do more Javascript and CSS and whatnot, and promote UX and accessibility.
Cloud-based password managers generally support 2FA. If you're prepared to use a "strong" password for one thing, why not another? What I mean is that even if you believe one needs a strong password, why not use a strong password for both?
You're saying, use KeePass' password generator but store the passwords in Bitwarden?
Why would you do that? What problem are you trying to solve?
You can't store master password logging into to that password manager in that pass man.
And you don't want to be locked out of password man.
Now you have two points of attack.
Getting the hands on *.kdbx won't be easy, unless you really compromised my machine.
Don't know about cloud password store, though. I do have 2FA, and email notifications, but I don't truly trust....
I also believe that a stronger master password is required for server-based pass man; stronger than file-based pass man.
Cloud-based password managers generally support 2FA. If you're prepared to use a "strong" password for one thing, why not another? What I mean is that even if you believe one needs a strong password, why not use a strong password for both?
It takes energy to truly remember any new master password, though. I will update master for Keepass later, not now.