DEV Community

Manuele J Sarfatti
Manuele J Sarfatti

Posted on

Is forcing full-screen a bad practice, or is this acceptable?

I'm posting it here for reach, I'd be happy if you gave your opinion and discussed why in the comments πŸ™

If you click through the tweet it's actually a poll, with the following options:

[ ] Hell yeah!
[ ] Please no.
[ ] Suggest, but don't force

Latest comments (7)

Collapse
 
ahferroin7 profile image
Austin S. Hemmelgarn

No. Never force UI layout on users when forcing it will potentially impact the user's ability to use their system as they would if your application (web or otherwise) was not there. Doing this type of thing is a very reliable way to seriously irritate your users.

In this particular case, I wouldn't even suggest fullscreen though. Most users don't mess around with it for anything in a web browser because it has a negative impact on their ability to multitask effectively even if they're using multiple virtual desktops/workspaces, and you end up gating a huge amount of browser functionality behind keyboard shortcuts.

As far as handling the UX benefits more sanely:

  • If it's just screen real-estate, stop owrrying so much about it. There's no reason that you need to be full screen in any well designed website or app that isn't an actively immersive game or VR-type thing.
  • If it's just because 'it looks better', then stop thinking like that. You're designing a website, not an OS, not a desktop environment, not a web browser. It's not your job to worry about how your site is framed on a user system.
  • If it's due to actual UI differences between the normal and full-screen versions, get rid of those differences (unless they're just based on viewport size). Changing UI between full-screen and windowed modes is almost always a bad idea for an app.
  • You mentioned it's for a photography site, so I assume the primary issue here is tro try to open images at the correct aspect ratio and as close to the correct resolution as possible. If so, do like most video sites do, start at less than full-screen, and for each image have a button you can click to open it full-screen, with a clear method to exit full-screen beyond the normal F11 option provided by the OS/desktop environment. The escape key is a good option for this as it's reasonably standard on websites for this type of thing.
Collapse
 
lehmannsystems profile image
Mike

Why not a well-worded suggestion? If something just went full-screen on me I would be upset.

Collapse
 
diek profile image
diek

Hell no, don't you dare!

Collapse
 
modayilme profile image
Benjamin Modayil πŸ‘¨β€πŸ’»

I think β€œforcing” is the keyword here. If the user doesn’t know clicking an image will fullscreen it, I would say thats problematic.

One solution could just be adding a warning that images will be opened in fullscreen.

A better solution might be to show a fullscreen icon when hovering over an image as it would describe to the user what might happen if clicked.

Collapse
 
robbiegm profile image
RobbieGM

Sounds like a bad idea. Is it just for the screen real estate? Because most people's browser windows are already near full-screen size.

Collapse
 
mjsarfatti profile image
Manuele J Sarfatti

It's not a real estate issue. It's really that going full-screen is a leap in experience. The galleries have a different, superior feeling to it, given the cleanliness of UI. The trade-off here is a little unexpected "something", but for a generally superior experience.

Collapse
 
robbiegm profile image
RobbieGM

No user really cares about that. They would rather be able to multitask properly and not have a website try to hijack their screen every 2 seconds.